We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Deadline For Federal Workers, Reaction To Trump's Gaza Plan, Future Of US Foreign Aid

Deadline For Federal Workers, Reaction To Trump's Gaza Plan, Future Of US Foreign Aid

2025/2/6
logo of podcast Up First

Up First

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
A
Adil Abu Majd
A
Ahmed Habib
A
Andrew Hsu
A
Andrew Natsios
G
Gabrielle Emanuel
I
Ian Martinez
K
Kat Lonsdorf
S
Steve Inskeep
Topics
Steve Inskeep: 我了解到联邦雇员面临一个艰难的抉择,特朗普政府提供了一个辞职协议,但其条款和合法性备受争议。许多员工对是否接受这份协议感到困惑,因为协议的细节一直在变化,而且存在法律上的不确定性。工会已经提起诉讼,质疑该协议的合法性,并警告员工可能无法获得承诺的报酬。对于那些选择留下的员工,他们的工作也面临着不确定性,因为政府计划进行裁员和机构重组。 Ian Martinez: 今天是联邦工作人员决定是否接受辞职的最后期限。许多联邦雇员正在考虑是否接受政府提供的辞职协议。然而,这份协议的条款并不明确,而且存在法律上的风险。工会已经对该协议提起诉讼,并警告员工可能无法获得承诺的报酬。对于那些选择留下的员工,他们的工作也面临着不确定性。 Andrew Hsu: 作为劳工记者,我深入调查了联邦雇员面临的辞职选择。我发现这份协议的条款非常复杂,而且存在很多不确定性。不同的机构发送了不同版本的协议,这让员工感到困惑。工会已经对该协议提起诉讼,并警告员工可能无法获得承诺的报酬。对于那些选择留下的员工,他们的工作也面临着不确定性,因为政府计划进行裁员和机构重组。我了解到,许多员工对这份协议感到担忧,并正在权衡他们的选择。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Millions of federal employees face a deadline to accept an offer to resign, creating uncertainty and legal challenges. The offer's details are unclear, varying across agencies, and unions are questioning its legality. Employees face a choice between resignation with benefits or uncertain futures.
  • Over 40,000 federal employees may resign, representing about 2% of the workforce.
  • The offer's details are inconsistent across agencies, causing confusion among employees.
  • Unions have filed lawsuits, claiming the offer is illegal and questioning the financial security of the deal for employees who accept it.
  • For those who choose to stay, job security is not guaranteed, and significant changes are expected.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Good morning to you. You said good morning. A. Martinez didn't say good morning. He's too good for me. Oh, morning. No, no, I say hello. Because you don't want to presume it is a good morning? For you or me. Do you say hola if you're speaking in Spanish? Hola, hello, hi. You don't say buenos dias? Buenos dias, I've had a turn on that one because it's like, how dare you tell me to have a good day?

You don't want to presume to instruct other people to be happy. Then I'm responsible if they don't have a good day. Oh. And I got to wait till the end of the day to hear if it was a good day. No, I don't want that kind of pressure, Steve. Okay. Next time I see you, I'm just going to say, deus. Deus.

Federal workers face a deadline today to take an offer to resign. I don't know anybody who's considering taking it who wasn't already planning on retiring. So says an employee at the Labor Department. What's the administration's next move? I'm Ian Martinez, that's Steve Inskeep, and this is Up First from NPR News.

When President Trump made a surprise declaration about Gaza, he also promised an announcement about the West Bank. What are people thinking there? Our correspondent is in the West Bank to find out. Also, how is the U.S. competing for influence in the world as the administration tries to shut down a foreign aid agency? The administration told workers for USAID they should all return from abroad. We just lost the battle.

It's not because we were fighting and we lost. We took our troops and we went home. Stay with us. We've got the news you need to start your day. This message comes from A24 with The Brutalist. Nominated for 10 Academy Awards, including Best Picture. Starring Adrian Brody, Guy Pearce, and Felicity Jones. Directed by Brady Corbett. The Brutalist, now playing in IMAX and in theaters everywhere.

This message comes from HomeTap. A HomeTap home equity investment gives you access to your home equity in cash to use for whatever you'd like, from paying off debt to making renovations or handling emergency expenses. And since a HomeTap investment isn't a loan, there are no monthly payments to worry about. Receive your funds in just a few weeks and start taking steps toward financial freedom. Learn more and get a personalized estimate at HomeTap.com.

Support for this podcast and the following message come from Jitasa, providing bookkeeping, accounting, and CFO services exclusively to the nonprofit sector. Jitasa is committed to serving nonprofits who make the world a better place. J-I-T-A-S-A dot com.

This is decision day for millions of federal employees who find themselves on a so-called fork in the road. That is the phrase the Trump administration put into an email telling federal workers they can stay or go. Their unions have said it's not really much of a decision, asserting that the offer that looks like a buyout really isn't. NPR labor correspondent Andrew Hsu joins us now. Andrew, can we ballpark how many federal employees have told the administration that they're going to quit?

Yeah, well, last night we were hearing it was more than 40,000 or about 2% of the federal workforce and growing. Now, I remember this offer to resign by today and still keep your pay and benefits until the end of September. It's gone out to more than 2 million federal employees, including people in the VA and the FDA, the Department of Education, even the CIA. So you can imagine these numbers could climb. But then

No, no, never.

I don't know anybody who's considering taking it who wasn't already planning on retiring. And I've also heard that people who have been fully remote and can't or don't want to comply with Trump's demand that all federal workers return to the office full time, that they are also considering taking this deal. OK, now for the federal employees who do accept, I mean, what exactly are they agreeing to?

Well, it's really hard to answer that with any precision because so many different versions of the deal have been sent out since last week. So the first email that went out nine days ago only said that people who agree to resign now don't have to comply with the return to office orders. Many people took that to mean they'd still have to work, but they could work from home. But then soon after, the Office of Personnel Management put out an FAQ that said, no, no, you're not expected to work at all and you'll still get paid.

And then this week, agencies sent out these sample contract agreements that changed the script again and said, actually, you do have to work through the end of February. And A, you know, these sample agreements also had a lot of legalese that said things like, by accepting the seal, you're waiving your right to any action against the government if things don't go how you expected. So it just sounds like

There's a lot of things that are unclear, right, with all this. Now, the offer, though, Andrea, is it even legal? I mean, what could happen to federal employees who actually take it? Well, as mentioned, you know, several unions that represent federal employees have sued, saying the offer isn't legal. They've asked a federal court in Boston to halt this whole thing until the government comes up with a policy that is lawful. And there's a hearing today at 1, so we'll know more later today. One thing that the unions have pointed out is that federal agencies are only funded through March 14th.

And there's a law that says agencies can't obligate funds that Congress hasn't yet approved. So unions and attorneys have been warning those who take the offer that there's no guarantee that they'll get the money that's been promised. For the employees who decide to stay, what happens to them?

Well, from the start, they've been told their jobs are not guaranteed and there are going to be significant changes. Agencies are going to be downsized. There are going to be layoffs. Everyone has to come into the office. It's really reminiscent of Elon Musk's resignation offer to Twitter employees, which was also titled Fork in the Road. The message to them back then was, if you stay, you'll need to be extremely hardcore. Here, federal workers have been told we're going to insist on excellence and we expect you to be loyal. But the

there's a really big difference between this, the government, and Twitter. Federal employees take an oath to be loyal to the U.S. Constitution, not to a particular president or administration. NPR's Andrew Hsu. Thanks a lot. You're welcome. ♪

Let's hear what some Palestinians think about the president who mused about their future. President Trump surprised allies and enemies alike this week when he called for the United States to take over Gaza. He said he wanted to relocate the nearly two million people there. Trump also promised some kind of announcement about another big Palestinian zone, the West Bank. Which is where we found NPR's Kat Lonsdorf in the city of Ramallah. Welcome back. Hey, good morning. What are you hearing on the West Bank?

Yeah, so a lot of people, when I asked them about Trump's comments, started kind of smirking and basically saying, you know, I'll believe it when I see it. But a few people I talked to did admit that Gaza is in ruins, people there don't have proper living conditions, and that something needs to be done. Here's Ahmed Habib. He's a pharmacist in Ramallah,

But he's originally from Gaza. He still has a lot of family there. He told me all I care about is if people there have food, have milk, he says. People in Gaza deserve to live. I don't care where Trump wants to put us if they can just have a good life.

But other Palestinians out here I talk to point out that Gaza is Palestinian land and that even if they think Trump's plan is not realistic, talk of moving people from that land is very emotional and unsettling. And of course, the conflict over the land is central to the area where you are. You're outside of Gaza. You're in a much larger land area, the West Bank. You have millions of Palestinians there.

You have Israelis who have founded settlements there and taken control of large parts of the West Bank. So what are people thinking and what is actually going on on the ground in the West Bank?

Yeah, I mean, you have to remember that the backdrop to all of this right now is that the Israeli military is still conducting a very big operation through many of the cities in the northern part of the West Bank. Israel launched this operation just two days after the ceasefire in Gaza went into effect. And they've said that this one is different from past operations. For example, Defense Minister Israel Katz announced that Israeli troops are going to remain in the Jenin refugee camp. That's the epicenter of the fighting. This hasn't happened before. It'd be a big shift in Israeli policy.

For months, Palestinians in the West Bank that I've been talking to here have told me that they've been worried that Israel's military focus might soon be moving from Gaza to them and ultimately that Israel might try to take more land here.

Well, let's talk about that because Trump mentioned the West Bank as well when he dropped this surprise proposal for the United States to own Gaza, which the administration has walked back to some extent since. He also said that in the next few weeks he'd be saying something about the West Bank. People must be wondering what that something is going to be.

Yeah, last night I met Adil Abu Majd. He's a chef in Ramallah. He's originally from Jenin, where the Israeli military is focused right now. He left a couple months ago. And he told me he's paying close attention to what Trump is saying. Of course, he gives you strength and he gives you peace and order, but for the people, I don't leave this country.

He said what Trump said about Gaza empowers Israel to do whatever they want, to take the land that they want. And he thinks annexation could be a real possibility here in the West Bank. After Trump was elected last November, several far right Israeli ministers commented that this might now be the time for Israel to move on West Bank annexation.

You know, I should point out that all of this would be illegal under international law. But Trump also appointed key people in his administration who have said that they would support Israeli annexation. So given Trump's Gaza statements and his planned announcement about the West Bank in the future, all of this has people here pretty nervous. NPR's Kat Lonsdorf in the occupied West Bank. Thanks so much. Thank you. Let's get a picture of what the United States has.

is no longer doing as the administration tries to shut down a foreign aid agency. Yeah, the Trump administration has put most of the agency's global workforce on administrative leave and frozen the majority of its budget. Elon Musk claimed without evidence that the U.S. Agency for International Development is corrupt or corrupt.

criminal. Secretary of State Marco Rubio says he wants to make sure the work aligns with the national interest. Until recent days, the U.S. was the largest donor of foreign aid in the world. And Piers, Gabrielle Emanuel covers global health and has some facts to put all this in context. Good morning. Hi. Okay, so when we say the U.S. has been the largest donor of foreign aid, how much are we talking about?

If you look at 2023, total foreign assistance was $66 billion. It reached a lot of people, but it represented less than 1% of the U.S. budget. Okay, so we certainly spend more on other things, but it's $66 billion, which is a lot for foreign aid. What did that mean for certain places like, say, Ukraine, where the United States has paid so much attention? Yeah.

Yes. So Ukraine is among the top recipients of U.S. aid. It goes to things like rebuilding infrastructure after it's attacked by Russia or seeds and fertilizer to build up the agriculture sector to get more exports.

The Trump administration has issued some narrow waivers, but most things have stopped. For example, NPR's Ukraine bureau has confirmed disruptions in the delivery of HIV AIDS medications. And I want to figure out where the U.S. interest lies. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, listen, I want foreign aid to be in the U.S. national interest and not charity. At the same time, Rubio acknowledged sometimes foreign aid is in the U.S. national interest. So why does the United States have

traditionally provide this type of assistance. So part of the thinking is helping people creates goodwill, and it gives the U.S. greater influence in the world by stabilizing countries so they don't turn to America's adversaries for support. Hmm.

I spoke with Andrew Natsios. He's the former director of USAID under President George W. Bush, a self-described conservative Republican. He says halting foreign aid is happening at a precarious moment as the U.S. competes with Russia, China, Iran for influence. We just lost the battle. It's not because we were fighting and we lost. We took our troops and we went home. That's what we did.

Now, he agrees with Trump that government spending is at crisis levels, and he does not think every foreign aid program is perfect. But he says cutting all of USAID is cutting muscle, not fat. I suppose we should pause to say that there are members of Congress who assert that all of this is illegal. Congress has devoted the funding to USAID and created this agency and that its work

it's supposed to go ahead, but we are told that everybody at USAID has been told to come home. So how's this playing out on the ground?

Yes. Well, U.S. assistance goes to a lot of things, but particularly health, helping control disease outbreaks, for example. So if we look at Uganda, it is dealing with an Ebola outbreak right now. The World Health Organization told me typically the U.S. would be funding technical support, like transportation of highly contagious Ebola samples and screening at airports to make sure no one is carrying the virus across borders.

But this time, that U.S. funding has stopped. Ah, trying to make sure it doesn't cross borders. And you can see the U.S. national interest there, I suppose. NPR's Gabrielle Emanuel covers global health. Thanks so much. Really appreciate it. Thank you. Thank you.

And that's a first for this Thursday, February 6th. I'm Steve Inskeep. And I'm E. Martinez. Don't forget, you can listen to this podcast sponsor free while financially supporting public media with a first plus. Learn more at plus.npr.org. That's PLUS.npr.org. Today's Up First was edited by Emily Kopp, Nishant Dehia, Rebecca Davis, Jenea Williams and Ali Schweitzer. It was produced by Ziad Butch.

Nia Dumas, and Christopher Thomas. We get engineering support from Nisha Hines, and our technical director is Carly Strange. Join us again tomorrow.

This message comes from NetSuite. What does the future hold for business? Can someone invent a crystal ball? Until then, over 41,000 businesses have future-proofed their business with NetSuite by Oracle, the number one cloud ERP, bringing accounting, financial management, inventory, and HR into one platform. With real-time insights and forecasting, you're able to peer into the future and seize new opportunities.

Download the CFO's Guide to AI and Machine Learning for free at netsuite.com slash story.

This message comes from Lisa. Using the highest quality materials, Lisa meticulously designs and assembles their mattresses in America for exceptional comfort and support. And with Lisa, your purchase has a purpose. Every year, Lisa donates thousands of mattresses to those in need, with more than 40,000 donated to date. Go to lisa.com slash NPR for 20% off sitewide. That's L-E-E-S-A dot com slash NPR and get 20% off sitewide.