We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Putin Meets Xi, Trump Faces Charges in New York, UBS Buys Credit Suisse

Putin Meets Xi, Trump Faces Charges in New York, UBS Buys Credit Suisse

2023/3/20
logo of podcast Up First

Up First

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
C
Charles Maines
I
Ilya Merits
R
Rob Schmitz
Topics
Charles Maines: 习近平对莫斯科的访问旨在深化中俄关系,尽管乌克兰战争带来了摩擦。中国在乌克兰问题上保持中立,但对战争对全球经济的影响并不满意。普京则寻求超越贸易的更多支持,并试图将俄罗斯与西方的冲突与中国与美国的紧张关系联系起来。普京对马里乌波尔的访问试图掩盖该城市的破坏,并将其归咎于乌克兰军队。克里姆林宫认为国际刑事法院对普京的战争罪指控无效。 Ilya Merits: 阿尔文·布拉格是曼哈顿地区检察官,他曾拒绝起诉唐纳德·特朗普的一个案件,但目前正在调查另一个案件,特朗普声称自己将在周二被起诉。布拉格在任初期面临一些公共关系问题,例如“第一天信函”引发的争议,以及对特朗普案件的处理。布拉格对继承的针对特朗普的调查进行了重新评估,并决定继续进行调查。布拉格正在调查针对特朗普的沉默费支付案,该案可能难以胜诉,但布拉格正在从头开始建立自己的案件。如果大陪审团对特朗普提出起诉,将特朗普带到现场进行指纹识别和提堂的物流将是对布拉格协调能力的巨大考验。 Rob Schmitz: 瑞士联合银行收购瑞士信贷银行,这笔交易旨在避免全球银行业危机蔓延。瑞士政府迅速促成这笔交易是为了避免瑞士信贷银行破产可能造成的连锁反应。这笔交易能否阻止其他银行挤兑,取决于人们对整体金融体系健康状况的悲观程度。这笔交易被认为是“bail-in”,而非“bailout”,但市场反应并不乐观,UBS股价下跌超过14%。这笔交易虽然旨在稳定市场,但仍存在蔓延风险,市场反应消极。

Deep Dive

Chapters
This chapter examines the meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping in Moscow, focusing on the implications of this rare alliance. It discusses the potential motivations behind the meeting, the state of the war in Ukraine, and the international response, particularly the International Criminal Court's charges against Putin.
  • Xi Jinping's visit to Moscow is his first trip abroad since his third term election.
  • China's stance on the war in Ukraine is characterized as non-condemnatory, non-participatory in sanctions and providing cover for Russian arguments.
  • Putin's surprise trip to Mariupol and the contrasting narratives surrounding the city's destruction.
  • The International Criminal Court's charges against Putin for war crimes and the Kremlin's response.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a war and is now wanted by the International Criminal Court. And today he's meeting a rare friend. China's President Xi Jinping is in Moscow. What's on the table? I'm Steve Inskeep with Leila Fadl, and this is Up First from NPR News. ♪

Former President Donald Trump claims that he could be arrested this week. We learn more about the prosecutor who is examining hush payments to an adult film actress. Who's Alvin Bragg and what's his plan? I do give him credit for starting from scratch, building his own case.

and making sure that he feels comfortable with it. And UBS is buying up rival Credit Suisse. It's a historic deal worth more than $3 billion. Was an international banking crisis just averted? So stay with us. We'll give you the news you need to start your day.

It's the anniversary of an event that shaped millions of lives. Even yours and mine, Layla, in a small way, since we both covered the war in Iraq. It was 20 years ago today that the United States began its invasion, firing missiles into Baghdad.

An American army soon followed and toppled the government. U.S. troops never found the weapons of mass destruction that the U.S. claimed Iraq had. They did trigger an insurgency that lasted for years, and the war killed hundreds of thousands of people.

And on this anniversary, we have news of a different war, the one in Ukraine. Russia's Vladimir Putin has a visitor today. He's one of Putin's few friends outside of Russia, and he's dropping by. Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow and will spend three days there where the two leaders will surely discuss the war in Ukraine. Yeah, joining us to talk about it all is NPR's Charles Maines in Moscow. Hi, Charles. Good morning. Good morning. So this is President Xi's first trip abroad since being elected to a third term.

Why Moscow and why now?

You know, state visits don't come together overnight. This trip was long in the works and aimed at deepening a relationship that the two leaders already said had no limits when they met in Beijing in January of last year. But that, of course, was before Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine, and that's injected friction into the relationship. You know, on the one hand, China has not condemned Russia's actions. It hasn't joined Western sanctions, and it's given cover to Russian arguments that the war was provoked by the West.

On the other, China isn't happy about what the war has done to the global economy. It projects itself as neutral on the Ukraine issue, even floating a peace plan, but one that chides Russia for nuclear saber-rattling and calls for respecting territorial integrity. And Beijing has billed Xi's visit as a peace mission around those terms. Interesting. What is Putin hoping for? Interesting.

You know, he's looking for more support from Xi beyond trade. Putin published an article in the Chinese press on the eve of Xi's visit, in which he really tried to bind Russia's fallout with the West over Ukraine to China's own tensions with the U.S. in particular, this message that this is our common enemy.

Putin also wrote Russia was open to Chinese peace proposals, but claimed the West didn't want an end to the Ukraine conflict because, Putin argued, the war was part of this grander plot to not only degrade Russia, but to contain China. You know, how convincing that will be to Xi? I guess we'll find out. And what is the state of the war? I mean, Putin made a surprise trip to occupied Ukraine over the weekend.

Yeah, you know, this was Putin's first known trip to the war zone, a surprise visit to Mariupol, the city occupied by Russian forces, but only after a scorched earth siege last year. Putin's visit came under cover of night, which means Putin and subsequently Russian television viewers saw little, if any, of the destruction of Mariupol. What they did see were new apartments, playgrounds, a new theater, and also a small crowd of grateful locals, one of whom told Putin that Russia had built a piece of heaven in Mariupol.

Another telling moment was this. This is Putin's deputy minister and point man for reconstruction, Marat Khusnulin, assuring Putin and, of course, TV viewers that Ukrainian forces were responsible for the destruction of the city and bombing civilians.

Ukraine had a different take, of course. An advisor to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said when it came to Putin in Mariupol, this was a classic case of a criminal being drawn to the scene of his own crime. A crime. Yeah, all of this is unfolding against the backdrop of these charges issued by the International Criminal Court against Putin for war crimes. Has Putin said anything about the charges? No.

No, and if Putin's concerned, he certainly isn't showing it. And that presumably was the subtext of his trip to Mediopol. The Kremlin has made clear the ICC court warrant charging Putin with overseeing the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children into Russia is null and void in their eyes. After all, Kremlin officials note that Russia, like the U.S., is not a signatory to the court. So there's no jurisdiction here. NPR's Charles Maines in Moscow. Thanks, Charles. Thank you.

We take a look today at the man who decides whether to indict a former president. His name is Alvin Bragg. He is the Manhattan District Attorney, so New York City. He famously declined to move forward with the prosecution in one of the many cases against one-time President Donald Trump. But his office is investigating a different case, and Trump at least claims he will be indicted on Tuesday, called for protest.

Now, the former president's predictions have often been unreliable, to say the least, but the DA did say his office will not be intimidated. So let's get to know the DA. NPR's Ilya Merits covers Trump legal matters and is with me now. Good morning. Good morning. So who is Alvin Bragg?

Alvin Bragg Jr. is 49 years old. He grew up in Harlem. He's a graduate of Harvard Law, and he worked for the Justice Department and the New York Attorney General before deciding in 2021 to run for Manhattan DA. He promised to reduce incarceration and be fairer to black and brown people, and he won, and he became Manhattan's first African American DA. And what are some of the significant markers in his tenure so far?

Well, you know, right off the bat, he ran into a rocky start. He had some pretty serious public relations problems. The first incident was around a document known as the Day One Letter. It said prosecutors should not seek jail time for defendants for a range of offenses from jumping subway turnstiles to, in some cases, robberies and assaults.

it wasn't exactly a surprise, but it fed fears about street crime. And there was an uproar, and he was forced to backtrack on some of those policies. And I think it showed how being an elected prosecutor, you really have to be so attentive to public opinion and the press. The other issue had to do with Trump. When Bragg was sworn in, he inherited a long-running investigation of Trump. Prosecutors were presenting evidence to a grand jury that

Yeah, didn't one of those lawyers publish a book laying out the disagreement?

That's right. And I just want to say this is incredibly rare for a former prosecutor to do what Mark Pomerantz did. He spoke publicly and in detail on an investigation that, you know, was still going on in the DA's office. Last month, Bragg pushed back. He said he looked at the evidence and he wasn't convinced. Mark Pomerantz's case simply was not ready.

So I said to my team, let's keep working. Which brings us to today. Now, Bragg is building a possible case around the hush money payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. What does Bragg's history and character tell us about how he might handle this?

People who know him personally say Bragg is decent, he's thoughtful, he has taught Sunday school for about 15 years. I wanted to know his relationship to risk because a lot of legal observers think the case he could be building may be difficult to win. Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen pleaded guilty for his role in the hush money payments, which amounted to a federal campaign finance violation.

But New York state law may be a difficult fit. So I put that to Donya Perry. She's a former federal prosecutor who counts Bragg as a friend. Some of the legal theories, as much as we can see from the outside in, do appear to be novel. But I do give him credit for starting from scratch, building his own case and making sure that he feels comfortable with it. So what's next in the case?

If the grand jury does indict Trump, the logistics of bringing him in for fingerprinting for an arraignment will be an enormous test of Bragg's ability to coordinate with the former president, his lawyers, the Secret Service, and the police. There are security concerns, including for Bragg and his staff. Trump has always said he is innocent, and he's been lobbing abuse at the DA on social media all weekend. NPR's Ilya Merits, thank you. You're welcome. ♪

One big Swiss bank is buying a competitor that's in trouble. The Swiss bank UBS is the buyer, and it is picking up Crady Suisse. To some English speakers that may look on the page like credit, Swiss. People following the news have seen and heard that name in recent days. The bank was under pressure after other banks failed and investors lost confidence in banking stocks. Now UBS has bought it cheap as part of a government-brokered plan to restore confidence.

But has it? NPR's Rob Schmitz joins us now from Berlin to talk about this. Good morning, Rob. Good morning, Layla. So Switzerland's biggest bank just got bigger by taking over the country's second biggest bank. What's the significance of this move?

It's a big deal. Last week, Credit Suisse lost around a fifth of its value in a single day. And this was spurred in part by Credit Suisse's mismanagement, but also in part by bank failures in the U.S. that began with Silicon Valley Bank and then spread to other small banks. Credit Suisse is not a small bank, but it's been weakened in recent years by scandals and customers have been withdrawing money for months.

Switzerland's central bank tried to help last week with a $50 billion injection of capital, but it didn't restore investor confidence. So over the weekend, the Swiss government brokered a deal for UBS to take over Credit Suisse. The government took the unusual move of bypassing a vote by Credit Suisse shareholders because they were in a rush to do this before markets opened on Monday morning. At a press conference last night, Karen Keller-Suter, head of Switzerland's Federal Department of Finance, explained why they were working so fast.

The bankruptcy of Credit Suisse would have had a collateral damage, a huge collateral damage on the Swiss financial market, also a risk of contagion for UBS and other banks, and also internationally. The risk of contagion. So the Swiss government was worried about a domino effect that would put other big international banks at risk. How likely is it that the deal will prevent that?

Yeah, that's a big question. It depends on who you talk to and how pessimistic they are about the health of the overall financial system.

The Swiss government emphasizes that this deal is not a bailout, and observers are actually calling this a bail-in, meaning that instead of the government spending massive amounts of taxpayer money to save a bank, they've persuaded another bank to save one of its competitors. And even though in this case, the Swiss government did agree to contributing a $100 billion liquidity line to UBS as part of this deal, for the

For Mark Williams, a professor of finance at Boston University, he says he's somewhat hopeful. In essence, what's happened here, hopefully, is UBS's purchase will put a line in the sand and hopefully quell any other concerns about growing deposit or runs. Okay, he's saying hopefully a lot. How hopeful are people that this deal will prevent other bank runs? How are the markets responding?

Not well. The first markets to open in Asia were not encouraging. We're seeing across-the-board declines. Here in Europe, markets just opened and they're down across the board by around 2%, with shares of Germany's two biggest banks down 3%. And most tellingly, UBS shares are down more than 14% in opening trading. That is not a good sign. A big problem here is that the holders of $17 billion worth of Credit Suisse bonds have had their investments wiped out in this deal. That is not a good signal to investors or to debt markets.

So even though this deal is meant to reassure the markets and prevent other bank failures, when it all comes down to it, there is a fair amount of anxiety over all of this. And the risk of contagion is still there, Leila. And PR's Rob Schmitz in Berlin. Thanks, Rob. Thank you. And that's Up First for Monday, March 20th. I'm Leila Faldin. And I'm Steve Inskeep. Up First is produced by Katie Klein and Ben Abrams. Our editors are Olivia Hampton and Alice Wolfley. Our technical director is Zach Coleman. Join us here tomorrow.

Thanks for listening to Up First. You can find more in-depth coverage of the stories we talked about today and much more on NPR's Morning Edition. That's the radio show I host with Steve Inskeep and A. Martinez. And Michelle Martin joins us next week. Find Morning Edition and your NPR station at stations.npr.com.