We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Writers' Strike, Debt Ceiling, SCOTUS Ethics Hearing

Writers' Strike, Debt Ceiling, SCOTUS Ethics Hearing

2023/5/2
logo of podcast Up First

Up First

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
M
Mandalita El Barco
N
Nina Totenberg
S
Scott Horsley
Topics
Laila Faldin和Amy Martinez:美国可能在6月1日之前耗尽资金,国会需要在最后期限前就债务上限达成协议。好莱坞编剧因流媒体时代薪酬协议谈判失败而罢工,参议院司法委员会正在调查最高法院法官的商业行为。 Mandalita El Barco:好莱坞编剧因薪酬、人工智能替代和合同更新问题而罢工。编剧协会成员将开始在各大制片厂外进行抗议,罢工可能还会波及演员、导演和其他幕后工作人员。制片厂联盟提出了一揽子提案,但与编剧在强制人员配备和工作期限方面存在分歧。编剧要求提高薪酬,认为流媒体时代他们的工作价值被低估,并且版税收入过低。Alex O'Keefe表示,编剧是缺乏工作保障的零工,收入不稳定,流媒体的成功并未转化为编剧的相应报酬。制片厂对谈判持开放态度,但流媒体盈利能力下降和可能的经济衰退给谈判带来了挑战。罢工可能立即影响深夜脱口秀和周六夜现场等节目,但对大多数电视节目和流媒体剧集的影响可能不会立即显现。 Scott Horsley:国会必须在6月1日之前就债务上限问题达成协议,否则政府将无法支付账单。美国财政部部长耶伦警告称,政府可能在6月1日之前耗尽资金,这比之前的预期要早。众议院共和党人要求大幅削减开支和政策改革以换取提高债务上限的投票,白宫拒绝谈判。接近债务上限可能会导致美国信用评级下调,增加美国家庭和企业的借贷成本。拜登总统邀请主要立法者参加下周在白宫举行的会议,讨论避免政府违约的紧迫性。参议院正在考虑众议院的议案,但该议案在民主党控制的参议院中没有通过的可能。避免政府违约对美国经济至关重要,因为经济增长放缓,物价上涨。 Nina Totenberg:参议院司法委员会正在举行听证会,调查最高法院法官的道德问题,包括未披露的礼物和商业交易。最高法院法官的道德问题引发了公众关注,专家们呼吁最高法院制定并公开其行为准则。最高法院法官配偶的工作和法官出售房产本身并不违法,但信息披露不充分会损害法院形象。国会无法直接指示最高法院,但可以通过立法要求最高法院制定并公开其行为准则。最高法院缺乏独立调查机制来评估其行为,这导致公众对其缺乏信任。最高法院的传统和不透明性使其难以应对公众对其信任的下降。

Deep Dive

Chapters
The US government faces a potential cash crunch by June 1st, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is demanding spending cuts in exchange for raising the debt ceiling, and President Biden has invited lawmakers to the White House for talks. Failure to reach an agreement could lead to a government default with severe economic consequences.
  • US government may run out of money by June 1st
  • House Republicans demand spending cuts for debt ceiling increase
  • President Biden calls for White House meeting to address the issue
  • Government default could severely impact the US economy

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

The U.S. may run out of money to pay its bills by June 1st. And House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is playing hardball. We will not pass the debt ceiling that just raises it without doing something about our debt. Can lawmakers reach an agreement before the clock runs out? I'm Laila Faldin, that's Amy Martinez, and this is Up First from NPR News.

Hollywood writers are going on strike after failed negotiations over updates to compensation agreements in the streaming era. Yes, the show is a hit, but I don't get paid every time somebody watches it. What does this mean for your favorite shows? And the Senate Judiciary Committee is investigating Supreme Court justices after recent reports found several judges had questionable business dealings. Stay with us. We've got all the news you need to start your day. ♪

Support for this podcast comes from NPR sponsor, Raymond James, a firm focused on transforming lives, businesses, and communities through tailored wealth management, banking, and capital markets solutions. Learn more at RaymondJames.com.

Hollywood writers are striking against the major studios. Yeah, writers are demanding updates to their contracts to keep up with the streaming era, and they don't want to be replaced by AI. After talks failed last night, leaders of the Writers Guild of America Union called on their members to stop working. Their three-year contract with the studios expired at midnight.

Here to tell us all about it is NPR's culture correspondent, Mandalita El Barco, who is in L.A. Mandalita, the Writers Guild of America has been in negotiations with the studio since March. So tell us more about this latest development.

Yeah, well, the WGA told its members that this afternoon they'll begin picketing outside studios represented by the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, Netflix, Amazon, Apple, Disney, Discovery, Warner, NBC, Universal, Paramount, and Sony. The striking writers might be joined by actors, directors, and behind-the-scenes workers, but

Thank you.

Now, in its own statement, the AMPTP said it had presented a package proposal to the Guild that included what it called generous increases in compensation for writers. The studio's alliance also said that the sticking points had something to do with mandatory staffing and the duration of employment on shows. What exactly have writers been asking for?

Well, these writers say they should be paid more for writing films, TV shows, and now streaming series. And they say, especially with the shift to streaming, their work has been devalued. Writers I've interviewed tell me the residuals that they're getting are just peanuts. That's what the money that they get when their episodes are rerun. They also say that the streamers are asking for fewer episodes in each season, and that means less work and less money for them. I

I talked to Alex O'Keefe, one of the writers for the FX series, The Bear. Yes, the show was a hit, but I don't get paid every time somebody watches it. I don't get paid every time somebody says, yeah, chef, hey, I don't expect to make the majority of the profits or anything like that. I just added my spice. It was a whole operation to cook up that show. But we don't receive the residuals that people associate with television shows.

Alex says writers are gig workers with no job security, constantly having to look for work. And he told me that between gigs, he is broke. You mentioned the deadline passed at midnight. What have studios been saying about this? Are they open to keeping negotiations going?

Well, they did leave the door open for that, and they said they were looking for the long-term health and stability of the industry. These contract negotiations have been happening at a time when the streamers are facing concerns about their profitability, and there also, of course, are worries about a possible recession. Over the past year or so, companies such as Disney, Warner Brothers, Discovery, Amazon, and Netflix have laid off thousands of employees.

All right, so tonight, Mandelit, or later today when people start to watch stuff, how will our watching be affected by the strike? Well, you know, the studios have reportedly been stockpiling scripts for months. Viewers might not notice any changes right away for most TV shows or streaming series or films, but audiences might notice tonight or this weekend the effect on late-night talk shows and SNL. Those writers won't be working. That's NPR culture correspondent Mandelit Del Barco in Los Angeles. Thanks. Thanks.

Sometimes it takes a deadline to get things done. Well, now lawmakers have a deadline. They have to settle the debt ceiling debate by June 1st. Yeah, that's when Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen says the government could run out of money to pay its bills unless Congress acts first.

to raise the borrowing limit. Yellen's warning adds new urgency to what had been a slow-motion standoff here in Washington. President Biden has called top lawmakers to talks at the White House next week. NPR's Scott Horsley is here with us. Scott, we've known the government cash crunch is nigh. What's Janet Yellen saying about this deadline?

She's saying it could come sooner than we thought. Most forecasters had expected the government would be able to limp along through mid-July, maybe early August before running short of cash.

But after reviewing the April tax receipts, Secretary Yellen says the crunch time could come as early as June 1st. Now, it's hard to say exactly. It could be later than that. But at some point, unless the debt ceiling's lifted, the government's going to find itself with more bills to pay than it has cash on hand, and then somebody's going to get stiffed. Maybe it's a Social Security recipient or a member of the military or a government bondholder. The

Defaulting on any of those obligations would be unprecedented. So Yellen is urging lawmakers not to let that happen. She wants Congress to let the government borrow more money so it can keep paying all of its bills. And what has been the holdup? House Republicans are demanding big spending cuts and other policy changes in exchange for voting to authorize additional borrowing. The White House says it's not willing to negotiate. It argues the full faith and credit of the government should not be used as a bargaining chip.

We went through something similar to this back in 2011, and a deal was finally struck at the 11th hour, but it was a scarring experience, and Yellen urged lawmakers not to go down that road again. Even coming close to the debt ceiling without raising it, we saw in 2011 that led to a downgrade of the U.S. credit rating, and this will raise borrowing costs for American households and businesses for a good long time.

House Republicans are pretty dug in, though. Last week, they passed a bill by the narrowest of margins that would curb federal spending and impose a wish list of other GOP priorities. In exchange, the bill would let the government keep borrowing money, but only until next spring, when we might have to go through this all over again. Now, Scott, you mentioned how the White House doesn't want to negotiate on this. So what happens now?

Well, about the time Yellen spelled out that June 1st deadline yesterday, President Biden invited top lawmakers to a White House meeting next week. The administration says Biden will use that meeting to stress the urgency of preventing a government default.

Separately, they say, the president will discuss a process to address government spending and next year's budget. Now, separately is the key word there. The administration wants to make the point that spending and budgeting are fair game for negotiations and horse trading, but lifting the debt ceiling is not. Okay, so what are lawmakers doing?

Well, the Senate has started going through the motions to consider the House bill, which has no chance in the Democratic-controlled chamber. Democrats call it the Default on America Act. The Senate's also weighing an alternative bill that would simply suspend the debt limit for two more years. And this comes at a really sensitive time for the U.S. economy. So how does a fight over this debt ceiling affect the broader economic outlook?

The economy already has plenty of challenges. Growth is slowing. Prices are high. The last thing the economy needs right now is a totally avoidable government default. And if you believe the Treasury Secretary's timetable, lawmakers have a little less than a month to take that threat off the table. NPR's Scott Horsley. Scott, thanks. You're welcome. Thank you.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is holding a hearing today on Supreme Court ethics after findings that Justice Clarence Thomas didn't disclose two decades of luxury gifts from a wealthy Republican donor. And there are other questions around the business stealings of other justices as well. Last week, Politico reported that Justice Neil Gorsuch didn't disclose the identity of the person who bought property from him in Colorado. It turned out to be the head of a law firm that has multiple cases before the Supreme Court. And over the weekend, it

Business Insider reported that Chief Justice John Roberts' wife made more than $10 million in commissions from elite law firms. Joining us now to talk about all this is NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg. Nina, why are they holding this hearing when none of the people involved are testifying?

Because I think we're at a bit of a tipping point. In the last couple of years, legal ethics experts who for years said, look, they're not violating the code of conduct, have changed their tune, at least certainly about some of Thomas's behavior. And the rest of these reports, they say, are just a kind of drip, drip, drip of

that makes it look bad for the court. And it's time, they think, for the court to write its own code of conduct. There's nothing wrong with a spouse having a job. Jane Roberts, the Chief Justice's wife, for instance, actually left being a lawyer and became a recruiter so that she would not be working for firms on matters that might come before the court.

And there is nothing wrong with Neil Gorsuch selling his property. He's allowed to do that. He should have said who bought it. But it turned out he didn't know the guy. The guy was actually a Democrat. Now, Nino, what can Congress actually do? Well, the court is a separate branch of government. Congress can't tell it what to do.

But there is, for example, a bill that would require the court to write its own code of conduct that it makes public and is clear about. And I think these kinds of suggestions will come more and more and more. Professor Stephen Vladeck of the University of Texas wrote that the reason that these news reports have such traction is that there's no independent person who can say, look, this is a nothing-burger.

In all the agencies of government, in Congress and in the executive branch, there's some form of...

independent investigator who can look at stuff and say, no, this is nothing, and can say, no, you need to do something about this. But that doesn't exist with the court. And until the court creates its own code of conduct, and I suspect tries to do something about having an independent voice looking at what it does, that's not going to change. So, Anita, how is the court responding to all this?

The court is an institution steeped in tradition and steeped in opaqueness. You do not know what's going on there. And it says over and over again, look, what we do, you do see. It's our opinions. They just can't perceive the idea that times have changed and people don't just trust them.

And because of that, as Amanda Frost from UVA, who's going to be testifying today, says, they are unable to distinguish. They are unable to perceive how much trouble they're in. That's NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Tildenberg. Nina, thanks. Thank you.

And that's Up First for Tuesday, May 2nd. I'm E. Martinez. And I'm Leila Faldin. Up First is produced by Ziad Vach and Shelby Hawkins. Our editors are Mohamed El-Bardisi and Alice Wolfley. Our technical director is Zach Coleman. Start your day here with us tomorrow. And thanks for waking up with NPR. Your NPR station makes Up First possible each and every single morning. Support them and support us at donate.npr.org slash upfirst.