We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Why is a new land law in South Africa is controversial, and why is Trump involved?

Why is a new land law in South Africa is controversial, and why is Trump involved?

2025/2/19
logo of podcast What in the World

What in the World

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
C
Carnie Sharp
H
Hannah Gelbart
Topics
Hannah Gelbart: 我是Hannah Gelbart,您正在收听BBC世界服务播客《世界怎么了》。今天我们讨论的是南非的土地所有制问题,以及美国总统唐纳德·特朗普如何错误地指控南非政府没收白人的土地。南非的局势非常危险,对许多人来说都非常糟糕。特朗普冻结了对南非的外国援助,并威胁要切断所有未来的资金。那么我们是怎么走到这一步的呢? Carnie Sharp: 我想先说明一下,这听起来可能很复杂,但我们会尽量简化它。总统在1月份签署的《土地征用法》基本上废除了1975年签署的一项法律。这项新法律使南非的土地所有制与民主制度相符。1975年的法律允许政府为其目的征用土地。在南非,大部分农田都属于白人少数群体,而他们只占人口的7%。占人口80%的黑人只拥有4%的土地。这项法律并非旨在解决土地改革问题,这是一个完全不同的过程。但基本上,这项《土地征用法》允许政府在与南非土地所有者协商一致的情况下征用土地。例如,如果一位白人农民拥有土地,南非政府将与他们协商,为了公共利益征用土地。这意味着如果国家想要建造学校、桥梁、体育场或任何其他对公众有益的东西,他们就会找到土地所有者,如果那块土地没有被使用,例如一位白人农民,并说:‘我们可以协商一个协议,我们付钱给你这块地,然后把它从你那里拿回来吗?’我认为人们之所以对这项法律感到紧张,是因为塞西尔·拉马福萨签署的《土地征用法》确实规定,在某些情况下不会有任何补偿。因此农民不会得到报酬。我认为这就是全世界似乎都感到恐慌的原因,但司法部门仍然拥有最终决定权。这些谈判将会进行。只有在极端情况下才会发生这种情况。正如你所说,社交媒体上对此有很多愤怒。但这并非唯一一个拥有这样法律的国家。南非并不是唯一一个拥有这样法律的国家。几乎世界上每一个国家,你都会认为,都有一部土地征用法。这仅仅意味着,在政府认为需要以对其人民大多数有利的方式使用土地的情况下,该法律就会得到实施。 我想更深入地探讨一下南非的土地所有制问题,因为这是南非一个极具争议的问题。在种族隔离制度结束30年后,大多数私人农田仍然由白人拥有。种族隔离制度是一种种族主义制度,它对黑人的待遇与白人不同,将黑人和白人隔离开来,生活在更贫困的条件下,机会更少,它在1994年结束。 这是否是一种试图解决土地改革并处理种族隔离过去不公正行为的方式?在某种程度上,你可以这样认为,因为当你再次审视南非的土地所有者时,它仍然是白人少数群体。但南非仍然有单独的土地改革进程,它试图在这些进程下处理这些问题。作为一名南非人,当我回到南非时,很明显是谁拥有南非大部分土地。因此,即使在种族隔离结束30年后,南非土地的受益者仍然是白人少数群体。因此,在某种程度上,是的,如果政府在这里对收回土地以造福大多数人民拥有更多控制权,那么你会认为这是一种公正的向前迈进的方式,使其符合南非宪法,宪法基本上强调,你知道,南非属于所有居住在这里的人民,所有居住在这里的人民。南非人民对这项法案有何看法? 这太有趣了。所以当塞西尔·拉马福萨在1月份签署这项法案时,国内出现了一些恐慌。你知道,像另一个最大的反对党这样的政党,现在作为联合政府的一部分在南非政府中任职。他们反对这项法案,因为他们认为它违宪。但我认为……这在某种程度上相当奇怪,因为与美国的问题基本上迫使南非人自己去深入挖掘并理解《土地征用法》的全部内容。这很有趣,因为归根结底,民主联盟现在已经与美国对抗,并表示,实际上存在很大的误解。现在南非正在发生的事情是,他们已经开始理解《土地征用法》是什么。他们看到了这种需求。大多数南非人,汉娜,都会支持这样的事情,因为它关乎不公正,它关乎以某种方式纠正40多年的种族隔离法律。 我想再多谈谈美国是如何卷入这一切的。所以有亿万富翁商人埃隆·马斯克,他当然是在南非出生和长大的。他是唐纳德·特朗普总统的得力助手,亲密顾问。他对这一切说了些什么? 这太有趣了,因为直到现在,当我告诉人们,你知道埃隆·马斯克出生在南非吗?他们会说,真的吗?我不知道。所以他在十几岁后期离开了,对吧?所以,是的,这是世界上最富有的人。现在,正如我们从听到和看到的情况所知,他是特朗普总统核心圈子的一员。现在,马斯克将南非描述为拥有种族主义的土地所有制法律。事情就是这样开始的,指责政府做得太少以阻止他所说的针对白人农民的种族灭绝,这是不真实的。种族灭绝是一个非常强烈的词。这是一个强烈的词。是的,但他仍然设法使用了它。然后有一个名为AfriForum的团体,它代表白人阿非利卡人,他们是一个右翼团体。似乎我们不知道,这是一个说法,我们不知道他们是否与美国政府内的任何人有直接联系,但它似乎得到了像埃隆·马斯克这样的人的关注。现在,虽然南非的白人农民被杀害,但他们并没有比南非的任何其他人更受种族针对。我们确实知道南非的谋杀率相当高。特朗普和马斯克当然都在社交媒体上非常直言不讳。唐纳德·特朗普在Truth Social上,埃隆·马斯克在X上。所以我想回顾一下他们在网上说的一些事情。我们将进行一个快速问答环节。你能告诉我这些说法是真是假吗? 首先,特朗普在Truth Social上说,南非一直在,引用,“没收土地,并对某些阶层的人非常糟糕”。强烈的错误。现在,这是不正确的,因为这项被美国政府和埃隆·马斯克通过错误信息解释的土地征用法案说,这就是正在发生的事情。但在南非的背景下,这绝对没有发生。好的,另一个问题。埃隆·马斯克在2023年的X上说,引用,“他们实际上每天都在杀害白人农民”。这不是…… 我该怎么说?所以它不是一个强烈的错误。它部分是正确的。但每天都有白人农民被杀害有点夸张。所以白人农民,你知道,会和每一个其他在……的南非人一起被杀害……是机会主义小偷或正在寻找,你知道,现金或金钱的人的受害者,但他们肯定没有被针对。我们知道,在南非的背景下,杀戮事件相当高,但它们并非种族针对性的。所以这绝对是错误的。 最后,同样在2月份的X上,埃隆·马斯克问道,引用,“为什么你们会有公开的种族主义土地所有制法律?”所以,我的意思是,再次……再次,这绝对是错误的。他是指种族隔离时期吗?因为那将是一个存在公开种族主义土地所有制法律的时期或时代。现在,绝对不是,因为正如我们所说,我已经说过几次了,南非大部分土地,80%的农田属于白人少数群体,约占7%。所以马斯克先生如何认为这是种族主义的,这令人震惊。这些短语表明唐纳德·特朗普和埃隆·马斯克对南非的感受有多强烈。这一切从何而来? 再次,我认为埃隆·马斯克得到了唐纳德·特朗普总统的关注。那里似乎有很多影响。这是美国政府过去从未谈论过的事情。所以现在你看到美国总统说埃隆·马斯克在社交媒体上发布的事情,甚至在上一届特朗普政府期间,这很有趣。许多南非人会非常担心唐纳德·特朗普正在做什么,并说他将由于这些关于土地被没收的指控而采取行动。现在,为了绝对清楚起见,非国大,即南非的执政党,表示没有土地在没有补偿的情况下被没收。但特朗普已经冻结了对南非的外国援助,并表示他将冻结所有未来的资金。这对那里的人们会有什么影响? 它已经在南非的背景下产生了影响,因为南非也是世界上艾滋病毒感染率最高的国家之一。美国国际开发署一直是获得抗逆转录病毒药物的人的收入来源。现在人们担心获得药物的问题。例如,如果他们无法获得药物,你可能会看到南非的艾滋病毒再次爆发。我认为人们对此非常担心。但更重要的是,汉娜,这是一个巨大的需求。南非担心贸易问题。我认为这真的很重要,必须谈谈。南非目前与美国在贸易方面保持着非常良好的关系。它是《非洲增长与机会法案》(AGOA)的一部分。南非是其中一部分。 但目前的情况使它处于非常非常脆弱的境地,因为AGOA的成员资格将在今年9月左右结束。特朗普政府可以做的是向南非政府施压,要求其退出成员资格,这意味着它将不再拥有相同的贸易协定,它将变得更糟,经济可能会崩溃。你知道,遭受损失。因此,南非的财政部长现在面临着一个问题,试图看看他们将如何修复这个问题。因为除了提供部分经济的美国援助之外,更大的问题是南非与美国在贸易协定方面的关系将如何?经济学家指出,暂停AGOA将对南非经济构成严重的风险。 我发现关于这件事真正有趣的是它与唐纳德·特朗普正在做的其他所有事情如何相符,因为他指责南非抢夺土地。但与此同时,他试图接管格陵兰岛、巴拿马运河和加沙地带。是的,绝对的。而且,你知道,南非人也在国内谈论过这个问题。他们说,你知道,这……这存在很大的虚伪性。你来到这里,向我们口述关于这项法律的事情,你认为,这在你的理解方式中是不正确的,但你正在谈论接管墨西哥湾以及,你知道,其他土地,例如,你已经提到的格陵兰岛。这已经成为南非背景下讨论的热门话题和一个笑话。康妮,非常感谢你来到演播室。不客气。感谢你的邀请。

Deep Dive

Chapters
The Land Expropriation Act in South Africa aims to align the country's land ownership with its democratic principles. It allows the government to acquire land, prioritizing negotiations with landowners but reserving the possibility of compensation-free acquisition in extreme cases. This has sparked controversy due to the historical context of land ownership in South Africa, where the majority of farmland is owned by the white minority.
  • The act cancels out a 1975 law, allowing government land acquisition.
  • Most farmland is owned by the white minority (7% of the population), while the black majority (80%) owns only 4%.
  • The act prioritizes negotiation with landowners, with compensation-free acquisition possible only in extreme cases.
  • The act aims to address past injustices related to racial segregation but is separate from other land reform processes.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. How to have fun, anytime, anywhere. Step one, go to chumbacasino.com. Chumbacasino.com. Got it. Step two, collect your welcome bonus. Come to Papa welcome bonus. Step three, play hundreds of casino-style games for free. That's a lot of games. All for free? Step four, unleash your excitement. Woo-hoo! Ch-ch-ch-ch-ch.

Chumba Casino has been delivering thrills for over a decade. So claim your free welcome bonus now and live the Chumba life. Visit ChumbaCasino.com. No purchase necessary. VGW group void where prohibited by law. 21 plus terms and conditions apply.

Hello, I'm Hannah Gelbart and you're listening to What in the World from the BBC World Service. Today we're talking about land ownership in South Africa and how US President Donald Trump has incorrectly accused the government there of confiscating land from white people. The South African situation is very, very dangerous and very bad for a lot of people.

There's tremendously bad things going on, including the confiscation of property. He's frozen foreign aid to the country as a result and has threatened to cut off all future funding to South Africa. So how did we get here?

Well, here to talk us through it is BBC journalist, Carnie Sharp. Hi, Carnie. Hi, Hannah. Thank you for having me. Thank you for coming into the studio. I want to start off with the Expropriation Act, which is what this whole big spat is about. It was signed into law in South Africa just last month after a five-year consultation process. What exactly is the Act? Right.

Right. Now, I want to start off by saying that this can sound complicated, but we're going to try and simplify it as much as possible. So the Land Expropriation Act that was signed in by the president in January is basically, it basically cancels out a law that was signed in 1975.

And the current law that has been signed is a law that brings into alignment the democratic South Africa with land ownership in the country. Now, in 1975, the government could revoke land for its purposes. What you find within the South African context is that the majority of farmland is owned by the white minority, and they only make up 7% of the population.

80% of the population who are black only own 4%. Now, this law doesn't look to redress land reform. That's a separate process within the South African context altogether. But basically, what it does with the Land Expropriation Act is allowing the government now to take away land

only under agreement with landowners in South Africa. So, for example, if a white farmer owns a land, the South African government will negotiate a deal with them to take away land in the public interest. What does that mean? So if the country wants to build schools or bridges or a stadium or anything to benefit the public, they will then go to the landowner. If that land is not being used, a white farmer, for example, and say,

Can we negotiate a deal where we will pay you for this land and we will take it back from you? I think the reason as to why people were getting so nervous about this was that within the Land Expropriation Act that Cyril Ramaphosa had signed in, it did say that in some circumstances there won't be any compensation. So farmers wouldn't get paid for it. And I think that's where everyone around the world, it seems, is.

panicked, but the judiciary still has the final say. Those negotiations will be done. And only in extreme cases will that happen. There has been so much outrage to this on social media, hasn't there, as you say. But this isn't the only country. South Africa is not the only country that has a law like

this? Absolutely. Almost every country in the world, you would assume, has a land expropriation law. And that only means that in cases where the government feels there's a need to use a land in a way that it sees would be beneficial to the majority of the people, that then law gets implemented.

Now, I want to dig into the issue of land ownership in South Africa because it is such a contentious issue there. Most private farmland is still owned by white people and that is 30 years after the end of apartheid. That was the racist system that treated black people differently to white people, kept black people separate from white people in poorer conditions, fewer opportunities, and it came to an end in 1994. I, Nelson Hodisasa Mandela,

Do hereby swear to be faithful to the Republic of South Africa. So, Kani, is this act a way to try and address land reform and to deal with these past injustices of racial segregation? In a way, and you could argue that it does, because again, when you look at who owns land in South Africa, it is still the white minority. But South Africa still has separate land reform processes, which it tries to deal with under those processes.

As a South African as well, when I go back to South Africa, it's very evident who owns the better part of South Africa's land. So the beneficiaries of land within the South African context, even 30 years after apartheid,

are still the white minority. So in a way, yes, if the government here has a little bit more control in terms of taking back land for the benefit of the majority of the people, then you'd see that then as a just way forward to bring it in line with South Africa's constitution, which basically emphasises that, you know, South Africa belongs to all people, all the people that live in it. And how do South Africans feel about this act?

Now, this is so interesting. So when Cyril Ramaphosa did bring it, you know, sign it into law in January, there was a bit of panic back home. You know, you had parties like the other biggest opposition party, which now serves within the South African government as part of the GNU, the United Government, if you like. They were opposed to it because they saw it as unconstitutional. But I think...

It's quite strange in a way because this issue with the United States has basically forced South Africans themselves to,

to dig deep and understand what the Expropriation Act is all about. And it's fascinating because at the end of the day, the democratic alliances have now come up against the United States and said, actually, there's a big misunderstanding. What's happening now within South Africa is that they've come to understand what the Expropriation Act is. They see the need for that. And the majority of South Africans, Hannah, would support something like this because it is about injustice and it is about correcting in a way

you know, over 40 years of the racist apartheid laws. So I want to talk a little bit more about how the US has got involved in all of this. So there's the billionaire businessman Elon Musk, who was, of course, born and raised in South Africa. He's President Donald Trump's right hand man, close advisor. What has he said about all of this?

Well, this is so interesting because, you know, up till now, when I say to people, do you know Elon Musk was born in South Africa? And they go, really? I didn't know that. So he left in his late teens, right? So, yeah, here's the world's richest man in the world. Now, a member, as we know from what we are hearing and what we're seeing, member of Trump's, President Trump's inner circle. Now, Musk has described South Africa as,

as having racist ownership laws. This is how it all started, accusing the government of doing too little to stop what he has referred to as a genocide against white farmers, which is not true. Genocide is a very strong term.

strong word. It is, but he still managed to use that. And then there is a group called AfriForum, which acts on behalf of white Afrikaners generally, who are a right-wing group. It seems as if we don't know, this is an allegation, we don't know whether they have direct contact with anyone within the US government, but it seems to have the ear of someone like Elon Musk. Now, whilst white farmers in South Africa are

killed, they are not more racially targeted than anyone else within South Africa. And we do know that South Africa does have fairly high murder rates. And Trump and Musk are both, of course, incredibly vocal on social media. Donald Trump on Truth Social, Elon Musk on X. So I want to go through a couple of the things that they have said online. We're going to do a quick fire round. Can you tell me if these statements are true or false?

So first of all, right, Trump on Truth Social said South Africa has been in, quote, confiscating land and treating certain classes of people very badly. Strong faults. Now, that's that's incorrect, because that expropriation law act, which has been interpreted by the US administration and by Elon Musk,

through misinformation, says that this is what is happening. But that is categorically not happening within the South African context. OK, another one for you. Elon Musk on X in 2023 said, in quotes, they're actually killing white farmers every day. It's not just a threat. That is...

How do I say? So it's not a strong false. It is partly true. But white farmers being killed every day is a little bit of a stretch. So white farmers, you know, will be killed along with every other South African who is on the other...

is on the receiving end of opportunistic thieves or people who are seeking, you know, cash or money, but they're not being targeted for sure. We know that killings, again, within the South African context is pretty high, but they're not racially targeted. So that definitely is false.

And finally, also on X, in February, Elon Musk asked, in quotes, why do you have openly racist ownership laws? So, you know, I mean, again...

Again, that's absolutely false. Was he referring to the apartheid era? Because that would have been a space or an era where there were openly racist ownership laws within the South African context. Now, absolutely not, because as we said, and I've said this a couple of times already, the majority of the land, 80% of the farmland in South Africa belongs to the white minority, which is around 7%.

So how does Mr. Musk see that as racist is quite astonishing. These phrases show how strong Donald Trump and Elon Musk's feelings are towards South Africa. Where does all of that come from?

Well, again, I think there's a strong sense that Elon Musk has the ear of President Donald Trump. There seems to be a lot of influence there. It's something that the U.S. administration has never spoken about in the past. So it's intriguing now that you have the president of the United States saying things that

Mr. Musk has been putting out on social media, even during the last Trump administration. A lot of people in South Africa are going to be extremely worried about what Donald Trump is doing and says he will do as a result of these allegations that land is being confiscated. Now, just to be absolutely clear, the ANC, that is South Africa's governing party, has said that no land has been seized without compensation. But Trump's

already frozen foreign aid to South Africa and says he's going to freeze all future funding. What impact will that have on people there? Well, it's already having an impact within the South African context because South Africa is also a country that has one of the highest rates of HIV in the world.

And the USID has been a supplier, if you like, in terms of income to people getting antiretrovirals. There is a fear with access now. And if, for example, they're not able to access their medication, you could see a flare up of HIV within the South African context. And I think people are really worried about that. But bigger than that, Hannah, there is this massive demand.

trade issue that South Africa is worried about. And I think this is really important to actually speak about. South Africa shares currently a really good relationship with the United States when it comes to trade. And it's part of the African Growth and Opportunity Act, which is called AGOA. South Africa is part of that.

But this current situation puts it in a very, very fragile situation because the membership for AGOA will come to end around September of this year. And what the Trump administration could do is use pressure on the South African government to withdraw its membership, which then means that it doesn't have the same trade agreements, that it will be worse off, that the economy could collapse.

you know, suffer. So the finance minister has an issue on his hands here within the South African context to try and see how they're going to repair that. Because outside of U.S. aid, which provides part of that economy, the bigger issue is what is South Africa's relationship like going to be with the United States in terms of its trade agreement? Economists have noted that the suspension of AGOA poses a serious economic risk for the South African economy.

What I found really interesting about this whole thing is how it fits in with everything else that Donald Trump is doing, because he's accusing South Africa of grabbing land. But at the same time, he's trying to take over Greenland, the Panama Canal and the Gaza Strip. Yeah, absolutely. And, you know, South Africans have been talking about that within the country as well. They said, you know, it's...

there's so much of a hypocrisy on that. You're coming to us to dictate to us about this law, which you perceive, which is not true in the way in which you have perceived it, but you are talking about the takeover of the Gulf of Mexico and, you know, other land that here's after example, Greenland, which you've already mentioned. It's become a huge talking point and a bit of a joke within the South African context. Connie, thank you so much for coming into the studio. You're welcome. Thank you for having me. ♪

And that is it for today's episode. Thank you so much for joining us. I'm Hannah Gelbart. You've been listening to What in the World from the BBC World Service. We'll be back with another episode soon. See you then. Hello, it is Ryan. And I was on a flight the other day playing one of my favorite social spin slot games on Chumbacasino.com. I looked over at the person sitting next to me and you know what they were doing? They were also playing Chumbacasino. Everybody's loving having fun with it. Chumbacasino is home to hundreds of casino style games that you can play for free anytime, anywhere, anywhere.

So sign up now at ChumbaCasino.com to claim your free welcome bonus. That's ChumbaCasino.com and live the Chumba life. Sponsored by Chumba Casino. No purchase necessary. VGW group void where prohibited by law. 21 plus terms and conditions apply.