We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Frontline special - Military analyst and former NATO planner, Philip Ingram

Frontline special - Military analyst and former NATO planner, Philip Ingram

2025/1/5
logo of podcast World in 10

World in 10

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
P
Philip Ingram
Topics
Philip Ingram: 我认为2025年将是乌克兰战争的关键一年,但并不认为特朗普会在就职后24小时内停火。特朗普团队正试图与俄乌等方接触,以探寻谈判的可能性,但情况比他们预想的更为复杂。普京在2024年12月处于弱势,但他成功地削弱了乌克兰的反攻,并在东部取得了一些进展。然而,俄罗斯的经济状况正在恶化,人员伤亡巨大,国防工业基础薄弱,这些都对其军事行动造成严重影响。普京试图通过破坏波罗的海海底电缆等行动,来削弱欧洲支持乌克兰的意愿,并以此为筹码进行谈判。特朗普上任后,利用经济手段(例如大幅降低全球油价)来促使双方谈判将是其最有效的工具。特朗普的策略是不可预测的,他将通过试探性行动来观察各方的反应,从而制定政策。俄罗斯方面否认特朗普与普京通话,并采取了威胁性行为,这表明普京没有从这次互动中获得预期结果。泽连斯基提出了他的胜利计划,包括可能暂时放弃部分被占领土,以换取北约成员资格和安全保障;而普京则拒绝谈判,并试图获得更多领土。特朗普可能会被说服,如果欧洲国家能承担更多责任,增加对乌克兰的军事援助和自身国防预算,那么美国对乌克兰的军事援助比例可能会降低。乌克兰战争对美国经济有利,因为对乌克兰的军事援助资金主要用于美国国防工业,创造了就业机会并增加了税收收入。全球多个地区冲突不断,这将影响美国的利益,特朗普可能会调整其外交政策重点,例如促使欧洲承担更多责任。欧洲主要国家在对乌克兰的支持方面存在政治分歧和犹豫,这可能会影响其与特朗普政府的关系。英国在对乌克兰的军事援助方面,保守党政府比工党政府更果断,这可能会影响英国与特朗普政府的关系。特朗普可能会将乌克兰问题放在其议程的较低位置,因为国内事务和中东、中国等其他国际问题对他来说更重要。如果特朗普不提供进一步的军事支持,而欧洲和北约其他国家也未能填补这一缺口,普京可能会将此视为胜利,这将增加中国攻台的风险。一些共和党人反对对乌克兰的援助,是因为他们认为缺乏明确的结束战争计划,以及对美国纳税人资金如何使用的误解。今年乌克兰停火协议达成的可能性为50%,停火可能会给双方提供喘息之机,但战争很可能会重新爆发。 James Hansen: (访谈主持人的问题和引导性发言,此处省略具体内容)

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why is 2025 considered a pivotal year for the war in Ukraine?

2025 is seen as pivotal due to speculation about a potential ceasefire, influenced by Donald Trump's claim that he could end the war within 24 hours of being sworn in. However, the complexity of negotiations involving Russia, Ukraine, and international stakeholders suggests that achieving a ceasefire will be far more challenging than Trump's statement implies.

What are the key challenges in achieving a ceasefire in Ukraine?

The challenges include the complexity of negotiations, differing demands from Russia and Ukraine, and the need for international consensus. Additionally, both sides are likely to use any ceasefire to rebuild military capabilities, potentially leading to a more intense conflict when hostilities resume.

How has Russia's economic situation been impacted by the war in Ukraine?

Russia's economy is under significant strain due to Ukrainian attacks on its oil, gas, and defense infrastructure. Daily Russian manpower losses are estimated at 1,400 to 1,600 personnel, which is unsustainable. Russia has also had to rely on North Korea and Iran for military support, further highlighting its economic vulnerabilities.

What role does Donald Trump play in the potential resolution of the Ukraine conflict?

Donald Trump's potential influence lies in his ability to leverage economic pressure, such as reducing global oil prices, to force negotiations. His unpredictable approach and focus on domestic priorities, however, make it unclear how he will address the conflict, though he may prioritize a deal that benefits the U.S. economically and strategically.

How has Ukraine's strategy evolved in response to Russian aggression?

Ukraine has shifted to targeting Russian infrastructure, including oil, gas, and defense facilities, to weaken Russia's economic and military capabilities. This strategy has been effective in creating significant economic strain on Russia, though it also comes at a cost to Ukraine, such as lost transit fees from Russian gas.

What are the broader geopolitical implications of the Ukraine conflict?

The conflict has global implications, including potential shifts in U.S. focus toward Southeast Asia and the Middle East, as well as the strengthening of alliances between Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran. The war also impacts global food security, as Ukraine is a major agricultural exporter, and its destabilization could exacerbate economic challenges in poorer nations.

How does the war in Ukraine affect U.S. defense industries?

The war has boosted U.S. defense industries, as military aid to Ukraine is spent on manufacturing weapons, ammunition, and vehicles in the U.S. This creates jobs, stimulates the economy, and generates tax revenue, making the conflict economically beneficial for the U.S. defense sector.

What are the potential risks of a ceasefire in Ukraine?

A ceasefire could allow both Russia and Ukraine to rebuild their military capabilities, leading to a more intense and bloody conflict when hostilities resume. Additionally, Russia may use the ceasefire to strengthen its position, making future negotiations even more challenging.

How does the Ukraine conflict impact global security dynamics?

The conflict has heightened tensions between major powers, with Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran forming closer alliances. It also risks destabilizing other regions, such as Southeast Asia, where China may feel emboldened to take aggressive actions, particularly regarding Taiwan.

What is the significance of NATO's potential increase in defense spending targets?

NATO's consideration of raising defense spending targets to 3% or 5% of GDP reflects growing pressure from the U.S. for European members to take greater responsibility for their defense. This shift could impact global security dynamics and influence U.S. support for Ukraine and other conflicts.

Shownotes Transcript

In this extended Frontline conversation James Hanson speaks to military analyst and former military intelligence officer and NATO planner Philip Ingram MBE about the war in Ukraine and what might be expected in 2025.

The World in 10 is the Times' daily podcast dedicated to global security. Expert analysis of war, diplomatic relations and cyber security from The Times' foreign correspondents and military specialists. 

Watch more: www.youtube.com/@ListenToTimesRadio 

Read more: www.thetimes.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy) for more information.