We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Joe Biden's Death Row Commutations and the Pardon Power

Joe Biden's Death Row Commutations and the Pardon Power

2024/12/27
logo of podcast WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
B
Bill McGurn
K
Kyle Peterson
M
Mene Ukebarua
Topics
Kyle Peterson: 本期节目讨论了拜登总统在圣诞节前夕对37名联邦死刑犯进行大赦,并将他们的刑期改为无期徒刑。这一行为引发了关于总统赦免权是否被滥用以及是否需要对宪法进行修正的讨论。 Bill McGurn: 拜登总统滥用了赦免权,将其作为政策工具而非个案审理。他应该通过立法途径而非赦免来改变死刑政策。赦免应该用于个案审理,例如罪犯悔过自新等情况。拜登总统的赦免决定前后矛盾,未能坚持反对死刑的原则。 Mene Ukebarua: 拜登总统的行动体现了立法过程的停滞,导致行政部门通过单方面行动来推动政策变革。这扩大了总统权力,越过了国会立法权。公众对死刑的支持率下降,但仍然认为在某些特定情况下,例如针对极其恶劣的罪行,死刑是合适的惩罚。拜登总统在竞选时承诺废除联邦死刑,但由于政治现实的阻碍,他选择通过行政手段来实现这一目标。对死刑犯进行赦免可能会削弱对服无期徒刑者在狱中暴力行为的威慑作用。 一些改革方案包括:限制总统赦免其家人的权力;禁止‘跛脚鸭’总统行使赦免权;确保赦免仅限于特定罪行,而非全面赦免;禁止先发制人的赦免。 Bill McGurn: 拜登总统缺乏原则性,其政治立场总是随着党派利益而变化。拜登总统选择赦免的对象并非基于原则,而是基于政治考量,避免因赦免特定罪犯而引发公众强烈反弹。修改宪法以限制总统赦免权是不必要的,因为宪法本身就旨在保护自由,允许犯错和滥用自由的空间。 Mene Ukebarua: 总统赦免权应该掌握在一个人的手中,而不是一个委员会或机构,因为这需要对个案进行判断。一个更可行的方案是禁止‘跛脚鸭’总统行使赦免权。由于拜登总统赦免其子亨特和特朗普总统暗示将赦免1月6日暴乱者,导致两党都对限制总统赦免权产生了兴趣。虽然有人提议限制总统赦免其家人的权力,但这项权力应该保留,因为总统可能掌握一些公众不知道的情况。对总统赦免权进行改革,应该限制其赦免范围,并确保总统对其行为负责。 Joe Biden: 拜登总统在声明中表示,他对停止联邦层面的死刑的决心比以往任何时候都更加坚定。他认为,在良知上,他不能袖手旁观,让新政府恢复他暂停的死刑执行。 Donald Trump: 特朗普总统曾表示,一旦就职,他将指示司法部积极寻求死刑,以保护美国家庭和儿童免受暴力强奸犯、杀人犯和恶魔的侵害。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why did President Biden commute the sentences of 37 federal death row inmates?

President Biden commuted the sentences of 37 federal death row inmates to life imprisonment without parole as part of his administration's moratorium on federal executions, excluding cases of terrorism and hate-motivated mass murder. He stated that he is convinced the federal death penalty should be stopped and wanted to prevent a new administration from resuming executions after he leaves office.

What criticism was raised regarding Biden's use of the pardon power?

Critics argued that Biden's use of the pardon power was inappropriate because it was based on a policy disagreement rather than individual case assessments. They contended that the pardon power is meant for cases with mitigating circumstances, not for mass clemency based on personal opposition to the death penalty. Additionally, leaving three inmates on death row undermined the principle that the state should not take a life, regardless of the crime.

Which three inmates did Biden leave on death row, and why?

Biden left Robert Bowers (Tree of Life Synagogue shooter), Dylan Roof (Mother Emanuel AME Church shooter), and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (Boston Marathon bomber) on death row. He excluded them because his policy excluded terrorism and hate-motivated mass murder cases, though critics argued this inconsistency undermined his principled stance against the death penalty.

How has public support for the death penalty changed over time?

Public support for the death penalty has declined over time. In 1994, about 80% of Americans supported it, while less than 20% opposed it. By 2023, support dropped to 53%, with 43% opposed. However, support remains higher for specific cases like mass shootings or terrorism.

What arguments were made for and against amending the presidential pardon power?

Arguments for amending the pardon power include preventing abuses, such as lame duck pardons or blanket pardons, and ensuring accountability to voters. Against amending it, some argued that the Constitution's broad pardon power is essential for freedom and flexibility, and that restricting it could lead to unintended consequences or bureaucratic inefficiency.

What is the proposed 'lame duck pardon ban' amendment?

The proposed amendment would ban presidents from exercising the pardon power from one month before the presidential electors are chosen until the next term begins (roughly October to January 20). This would prevent lame duck presidents from issuing controversial pardons without voter accountability.

What is the deterrent argument for the death penalty in prisons?

The deterrent argument suggests that the death penalty prevents violence in prisons by deterring inmates already serving life sentences from committing further crimes, such as murdering guards or other inmates, since they have no fear of additional punishment.

Chapters
President Biden commuted the sentences of 37 out of 40 federal death row inmates. This action is criticized as an abuse of the pardon power, substituting policy disagreements for individual case assessment. The inconsistency of leaving three inmates' sentences intact further fuels this criticism.
  • President Biden commuted sentences of 37 death row inmates.
  • Critics argue this was a misuse of pardon power based on policy, not individual cases.
  • The decision to leave 3 inmates' sentences intact is inconsistent and questionable.

Shownotes Transcript

The president spares 37 of the 40 inmates facing the federal death penalty, commuting their sentences to life in prison. Is this an appropriate use of the pardon power, issuing mass clemency based on policy disagreements with the law? Will this action in Biden's last days in office, so soon after he pardoned his son Hunter, add to the arguments for a constitutional amendment?

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices)