We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Robert D. Kaplan, Author And Foreign Affairs Expert Talks Iranian Blowback

Robert D. Kaplan, Author And Foreign Affairs Expert Talks Iranian Blowback

2025/6/23
logo of podcast Bloomberg Talks

Bloomberg Talks

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
R
Robert Kaplan
Topics
Robert Kaplan: 我认为技术在一定程度上改变了我们对以色列和伊朗战争的看法,因为技术缩短了地理距离。美国通过技术手段缩短了与伊朗的距离,使得伊朗在作战层面上与美国的距离,就像19世纪中叶堪萨斯与印第安战争的距离一样。将当前局势与伊拉克战争相提并论是错误的,因为这次冲突主要涉及空中和海军力量,不会陷入地面战的泥潭。我认为伊朗会有所回应,可能需要几天或几周的时间,可能是欧洲的恐怖袭击,也可能是伊拉克亲伊朗的什叶派民兵袭击美军。评估特朗普总统轰炸伊朗核设施的决定是否明智,至少需要几个月的时间。 伊朗不是阿拉伯世界,它是一个拥有数千年历史的民族国家,文化高度发达。伊朗是古代世界第一个超级大国。伊朗不存在单一的政治权力中心,而是多个权力中心。在伊朗,你会被其规模和复杂性所震撼。我认为一次对核设施的袭击就能线性地导致政权更迭,这种想法过于简单化。伊朗可能会发生政权演变,但这将是内部驱动的,而不是外部强加的。 美国现在的策略应该是尽量避免再次攻击和回应。如果伊朗的反应只是像之前那样不痛不痒,就没有必要回应。现在的政策应该是降低温度,不要谈论从外部改变政权。伊朗不可能重建到像以前那样的核设施水平,而且以色列会随时准备再次攻击。这次袭击确实造成了实质性的破坏。现在对以色列来说是一个独特的时刻,可以扩大其在中东地区的影响力并增强其安全性。内塔尼亚胡是一位具有世界历史意义的人物。内塔尼亚胡能够对伊朗发动战术上的突然袭击,并操纵特朗普总统采取行动,这简直是非同寻常的。以色列现在应该做的是,在得到美国帮助后,给予美国一些回报,即开始从加沙撤军。我认为特朗普总统可能缺乏对悲剧的深刻理解,但他可能具有某种悲剧意识。老布什总统是一位真正具有深刻悲剧意识的人。老布什政府的伟大之处在于,它避免了很多可能发生的坏事。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Robert Kaplan discusses the impact of technology on the conflict, highlighting how it has shortened the operational distance between Iran and the US. He emphasizes that this conflict differs from previous wars in the Middle East, as it primarily involves air and naval assets, minimizing the risk of a prolonged ground war, although acknowledging potential blowback.
  • Technology has condensed the distance between Iran and Israel/US.
  • The conflict is primarily air and naval, unlike previous ground wars.
  • Potential for blowback, but less likely to be a prolonged quagmire.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

This is an iHeart Podcast. For enterprise organizations, managing all your food needs is a tall order. But with EasyCater, you get a single workplace food vendor with the tools and resources to make it easy, giving teams across your organization an easy way to order from a huge variety of restaurants, all on one platform. All while consolidating your corporate food spend so you can control costs, streamlining billing and payment and simplifying reporting.

EasyCater, your business tool for food. To learn more, visit easycater.com slash podcast. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news. Robert T. Kaplan, over a stretch of over 20 books, just simply speaks of the map. If you're one of those believers in get out the map and look at it,

Kaplan is definitive. His new tour de force is Wasteland, a world in permanent crisis. This coming off my book of the year a few years ago, The Loom of Time from Morocco to Persia. Robert Kaplan, thank you so much for joining us. I'll cut to the chase. You say technology has permanently changed our map, our geography. Is that true of this war with Israel and Iran?

Yes, it is to an extent, because Iran is a long distance from Israel on the map.

But yet the Israelis and, of course, the Americans have condensed that distance through technology. The American—excuse me—the Americans sent B-2 bombers all the way from the center of the United States, Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, to bomb Iran, so that Iran is as close to America in operational terms

as Kansas was to the Indian Wars in the middle of the 19th century. And let me just make one thing very clear here. - Please. - Yeah, people who were saying that this could lead to another forever war, Middle East quagmire, they're making a mistake of category.

Iraq was in a different category

than Iran. Iraq was in the category of Vietnam and Afghanistan and Korea, in the sense that it involved tens of thousands of ground troops, which got stuck literally in a quagmire. Here we're dealing with just air and naval assets. The war could go in a number of ways. There could be blowback.

But as long as we stick with air and naval assets, there's not going to be a quagmire. There's going to be something different. It may be something bad, but it will simply exist in a category different from those four forever wars: Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. Robert, what do you expect the response from Iran will be?

I think there will be a response. It may take a few days or a few weeks. It may be a terrorist attack in Europe. It may be an attack by pro-Iranian Shia militia in Iraq on US troops not too far away. There certainly will be blowback, but it's gonna take a few months at least

to really register whether this decision by President Trump to bomb the Iranian nuclear facilities was a wise or an unwise decision. It will unfold in stages. And you're the loom of time. And folks, I can't say enough about this is your single concise read on the span from Morocco to the Eastern Arab world and over to Persia.

You talked there, Robert Kaplan, about the giant of your academics, which is Clifford Geertz.

And it's the idea of culture. Describe for our American audience today the Persian culture, the Persian culture extant since the theocracy of 1979. Yes. Persia, Iran is not the Arab world. It is not Iraq. It is not Syria. It is not Libya.

Iran has been a nation state of sorts on the Iranian plateau for thousands of years. Iran was the world's first superpower in antiquity. You're dealing with a highly sophisticated, highly evolved culture and civilization where there is not one center of political power, but multiple centers of political power.

You know, I've been to Iran several times. It takes two hours in traffic to drive from one end of Tehran to the other. Being in Iran is like being in Egypt or India. That is, it's overwhelming. You feel overwhelmed.

So the so the idea that, you know, that a singular attack on nuclear facilities is going in a linear fashion to lead to a regime change is far too simplistic. They're they're made, you know, they're very, very well likely coups.

could be a regime evolution, as I call it, but it will involve many other factors and it will be internally driven. It won't be imposed from the outside. Robert, what do you think our U.S. strategy should be towards Iran at this point? Again, over the weekend, a significant escalation in military action. What should be our strategic plan?

Well, at this point, we should try, as President Trump said, to keep it a one off, that we try as hard as we can not to attack again, not to respond again. You know, if they're just going to do a desultory pinprick response like they did after President Trump ordered the assassination of Khabib,

Qasem Soleimani, the head of the al-Quds Force back in 2020, in January 2020, I think it was, there's no need to respond. You know, the policy now should be to lower the temperature, not talk about changing a regime from the outside, because the damage has been done. It will take days or weeks to more properly assess exactly how much damage was done.

But the idea that the Iranians are just going to rebuild their nuclear facilities is very simplistic. They're never going to rebuild it to the point that Ferdow or Natanz was. You know, way before they get to that point, the Israelis will be able to attack them. So this attack really did do substantial damage.

What do you expect Israel to do here? Because a lot of folks are suggesting this is a unique time for Israel here in terms of exerting and expanding its role within the Middle East and adding to its security. Is this a unique time for Israel? Yes, it is, because Benjamin Netanyahu, love him or hate him,

is a world historical figure. People may forget Clinton, Obama, and Biden, and half of the European prime ministers, you know, who will be forgotten in the course of the decades. But decades from now, people will be writing biographies about Netanyahu.

Because he's been in power so long, and the way he was able to achieve tactical surprise in his attacks on Iran, and then, I'll use the word, manipulate President Trump into taking action on his own, is nothing short of extraordinary. Right.

I think what the smart thing for the Israelis to do now, now that they got help from the U.S., is to give the U.S. something. That is, start the process of withdrawing from Gaza. Robert Kepin, one final question. We've got to run on with the day. And again, folks, I can't say enough about wasteland issues.

Robert Kaplan's new effort in the loom of time, my book of the year. You wrote a monograph, I'm going to call it the tragic mind, taking us back to Greek mythology and how we need tragedy to move forward. Does President Trump have a tragic mind?

In there somewhere, is there a philosophy of tragedy as a foundation to strength? That's a very hard, yeah, Tom, that's a very hard question to answer because I don't sense it. I think he's too vain and superficial to really have a deeply developed sense of tragedy. But I could be wrong.

I could be wrong on this, because the person who really did have a deeply evolved sense of tragedy was President George H.W. Bush,

who is very cautious. You know, the great thing about his administration was not what happened, but all the bad things that did not happen because of his governance. This has been wonderful. Robert Kaplan, thank you so much. It's a must-read, folks. Wasteland, a world in permanent crisis. For enterprise organizations, managing all your food needs is a tall order.

This is an iHeart Podcast.