Pushkin. AI is rewriting the business playbook with productivity boosts and faster decision making coming to every industry. If you're not thinking about AI, you can bet your competition is. This is not where you want to drop the ball, but AI requires a lot of compute power. And with most cloud platforms, the cost for your AI workloads can spiral. That is unless you're running on OCI, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. This was the cloud built for AI, a
A blazing fast enterprise-grade platform for your infrastructure, database, apps, and all your AI workloads. OCI costs 50% less than other major hyperscalers for compute, 70% less for storage, and 80% less for networking. Thousands of businesses have already scored with OCI, including Vodafone, Thomson Reuters, and Suno AI. Now the ball's in your court. Right now, Oracle can cut your current cloud bill in half if you move to OCI. Minimum financial commitment and other terms apply.
Offer ends March 31st. See if your company qualifies for this special offer at oracle.com slash strategic. That's oracle.com slash strategic. LinkedIn will help connect you with professionals you can't find anywhere else, even people who aren't actively looking for a new job. In a given month, over 70% of LinkedIn users don't visit other leading job sites. So if you're not looking at LinkedIn, you're looking in the wrong place.
Hire professionals like a professional and post your job for free at linkedin.com slash Gladwell. That's linkedin.com slash Gladwell to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply.
Cautionary Tales is proudly sponsored by Amica Insurance. As Amica says, empathy is our best policy. That's why they'll go above and beyond to tailor your insurance coverage to best fit your needs. Whether you're on the road, at home, or travelling along life's journey, their friendly and knowledgeable representatives will work with you to ensure you have the right coverage in place. Amica will provide you with peace of mind. Go to amica.com and get a quote today.
You might have noticed that things are a little different on Cautionary Tales this year. In 2024, we brought you a new episode every fortnight. But this year, we are doubling our output. New stories of heart-thumping peril, mind-blowing mistakes, and jaw-dropping scandal will now be delivered straight to your ears every week. Here's one for you right now.
G'day, my name's Adam Hills and welcome to a special children's music edition of Spicks and Specks. Spicks and Specks is a long-running staple of Australian TV. It's an irreverent quiz show, pitting mixed teams of musicians and comedians against one another to answer questions on rock and pop.
In 2007, host Adam Hills was presiding over a special episode dedicated to kids' tunes. There'd be lots of comic potential in that. He asked the teams to buzz in if they could name the Australian nursery rhyme that this riff was based on. The opening bars of Men At Work's song Down Under played. The two teams looked mystified. Which nursery rhyme?
Down Under is often referred to as Australia's alternative national anthem. It is to Australians what Bruce Springsteen's Born in the USA is to Americans. Back in the early 1980s, it was a global smash, topping the charts in Canada, the US, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Switzerland.
It went gold, then platinum, then double platinum. Millions of copies were sold. The team on Spix and Spex had no doubt heard it hundreds, if not thousands of times. But no-one could think of an Australian nursery rhyme that sounded remotely like it. Are you kidding? One of the exasperated contestants asked Adam Hills. OK, I'll give you one more listen to it, said Hills.
This bit especially. Hills punched his pen in the air along to the rhythm of the song's flute line. More blank stares. One contestant held her head in her hands. The question was frying her brains. Finally, someone buzzed in. Kookaburra sits in the old gum tree? That's exactly right, said Hills. APPLAUSE
Relieved that someone got the answer at last. Watching everyone flummoxed wasn't a memorable moment that would enter the annals of TV history. Or was it? Someone watching Spicks and Specks that night was certainly intrigued by the exchange and quickly reached out to Norm Urie, Managing Director of Larrikin Music Publishing.
Did he know that men at work had used Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree in their smash hit record? Norm did not, but the information interested him greatly. He now seemed to have a very valuable property on his hands because years before, and for a song, he'd bought the rights to that simple, catchy nursery rhyme. Now...
Thanks to Spix and Spex, his company might collect a fortune. I'm Tim Harford, and you're listening to another Cautionary Tale. Flute player Greg Hamm was a late addition to men at work.
The band's founding members, the Scots-born singer Colin Hay and lead guitarist Ron Strykert, had been playing as an acoustic duo for a year or so. They performed together and wrote together, in what Friends described as a musical marriage. Colin Hay had a folk background, but with Ron Strykert, no style was off the table.
They experimented with punky new wave sounds and mixed in the more laid-back beats of reggae. One of their first joint compositions was Down Under, a jokey ode to the legendary wanderlust of Australians.
The song tells of an Aussie youth travelling the world in a beaten-up VW campervan, encountering strange and exotic locals who are all transfixed by his Antipodean homeland. Do you come from the land down under? They would ask him. Where beer does flow and men chunder? Chunder, by the way, is Australian slang for vomit.
Down Under paints an unsentimental yet fond picture of modern Australia. And it went down a storm when the band, now swelled with a bassist, drummer and Greg Hamm on flute, played it in the rowdy pubs of Melbourne.
It was the B-side of their self-financed first single, but it wasn't the version you'd probably recognise. It had a slower, dreamier tempo, a bit prog rock, a bit reggae, a bit psychedelic. When the band signed to a major label and the track was re-recorded, Greg Hamm came up with a new flute hook to enliven a sped-up arrangement. It had come to him during a live jam session.
Down Under was quintessentially Australian and he wanted to add to the existing composition what he called an Aussie cliché melody. Marion Sinclair had been making up songs and rhymes since she was a girl, an only child and home-educated musician.
Marion staved off loneliness by creating a rich internal world of fantasy and imagination. Piano lessons gave her the musical education to hone her compositions and set them down on paper. She made this youthful hobby her life, becoming a drama and music teacher in the 1920s and throwing herself into the Girl Guides, the Australian equivalent of the Girl Scouts.
It was while in church that inspiration struck Marion, prompting her to create by far her most popular ditty. Rushing home, she sat down, kookaburra sits in the old gum tree. The kookaburra is one of Australia's most iconic birds. Carnivorous, boisterous and noisy, its call resembles a raucous human laugh.
Gum trees, or rather trees of the eucalyptus family, are equally iconic and quintessentially Australian. Perhaps this subject matter swayed the judges when, in 1934, Marian entered her song for a competition run by the Girl Guides Association of Victoria.
They wanted a typically Australian round to be sung at the upcoming Pan Pacific Scouting Jamboree. And they chose Kookaburra. Rounds are simple tunes where the singers follow the same melody but start at different times.
Row, Row, Row Your Boat, Frère Jacques and Three Blind Mice are prime examples. They're a fun and near foolproof way for amateur singers to achieve a pleasing harmony. You no doubt sung them at school. Kookaburra almost instantly became a classic of the genre.
And when the international visitors to the Jamboree returned home, they took with them this slice of Australiana, singing it lustily from London to Lahore. Marion Sinclair didn't cash in on this success, though. Heaven forbid. Marion wasn't interested in collecting royalties from scouts or guides or anyone else enjoying her song and encouraging others to sing it.
It wasn't until 1975 that Marian was finally persuaded to register the composition as belonging to her. And she was far too busy studying, teaching, aiding refugees, working with old people and running a hostel for girls to chase people for copyright infringement and demand her dues. It's conceivable that in old age she heard Down Under. In Australia it was played everywhere.
but she either didn't recognise any similarities to her own composition or simply didn't care. Marion dismissed Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree as a trifle and no match for her other songs. And anyway, it came to me from above, she'd say. I don't own it. After a life of Christian service, Marion Sinclair died in 1988.
having signed over her rights to the Libraries Board of South Australia. Larrikin Music Publishing then swooped in to buy the ownership of Kookaburra, with an interesting business model in mind. For years, people had assumed Marian's song was free to use, so they'd included it in books teaching youngsters to play musical instruments and recorded it on albums of children's songs.
Norm Lurie at Larroquin, now busied himself delivering the bad news. Kookaburra was under new ownership and it wasn't free. Norm had spent only a few thousand dollars acquiring the rights, a sum he'd swiftly recouped.
It's earned a hell of a lot of money for us since we've bought it, he admitted. But thanks to Spix and Spex, Larrikin was now looking at a very different proposition. Down Under had helped Men at Work win a Grammy. Its initial success as a single had been huge, but it had been steadily earning on albums and greatest hits compilations for nearly 30 years.
Norm Leury now wanted a cut, so sued Men at Work for 60% of the profits. It was a huge sum, and if he won, it was a figure that would cause the members of Men at Work immense suffering. Cautionary Tales will be back in a moment.
I was joking with my producer Jacob the other day, who's one of Pushkin's most valuable employees. I hired him to be my assistant years ago in the most random manner possible. I think he saw a message board posting somewhere and I interviewed him for basically 10 minutes and said, go for it. I made a wild gamble on someone and got incredibly lucky.
But let's be honest, you can't rely on getting lucky when it comes to hiring people. Lightning's not going to strike more than once. You need a system and you need tools. And that's why LinkedIn is so important. LinkedIn is more than just a job board. They help connect you with professionals you can't find anywhere else. Even people who aren't actively looking for a new job.
In a given month, over 70% of LinkedIn users don't visit other leading job sites. So if you're not looking on LinkedIn, you're looking in the wrong place. Hire professionals like a professional and post your job for free at linkedin.com slash gladwell. That's linkedin.com slash gladwell to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply.
Cautionary Tales is proudly sponsored by Amica Insurance. As Amica says, empathy is our best policy. That's why they'll go above and beyond to tailor your insurance coverage to best fit your needs. Whether you're on the road, at home, or travelling along life's journey, their friendly and knowledgeable representatives will work with you to ensure you have the right coverage in place. Amica will provide you with peace of mind. Go to amica.com and get a quote today.
During tax season, your sensitive info does a lot of traveling to places you can't control. Stopping off at payroll, your accountant or tax preparer, and countless other data centers on its way to the IRS. Any of them can expose you to identity theft because they all have the info on your W-2, just the ticket for criminals to steal your identity. No wonder the IRS reported tax fraud due to identity theft went up 20% last year. You need LifeLock.
They monitor millions of data points per second and alert you to threats you could miss. If your identity is stolen, LifeLock's U.S.-based restoration specialists will fix it, backed by the million-dollar protection package. And restoration is guaranteed, or your money back. Don't let identity thieves take you for a ride. Get LifeLock protection for tax season and beyond.
Join now and save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code IHEART or go to lifelock.com slash IHEART for 40% off. Terms apply. Men at work's flute maestro, Greg Hamm, took the news of the court case hard. I'm terribly disappointed that that's the way I'm going to be remembered, for copying something.
Greg's flute riff, improvised at a jam session and overlaid on a song written before he'd even joined the band, was threatening to sink men at work. If the judge found for Larrikin Music Publishing, how would they unpick 30 years of earnings? They'd spent that money on houses, businesses, invested it for their old age.
To suddenly hand over 60% now would mean liquidating their assets, auctioning off possessions and putting their homes up for sale. Faced with this and backed by his record company, lead singer Colin Hay decided to fight. He was going to argue that Kookaburra hadn't been, to use the legal term, substantially reproduced in their hit song.
When I co-wrote Down Under back in 1978, the singer said angrily, I appropriated nothing from anyone else's song. There was no men at work, there was no flute, yet the song existed. To the judge's delight, Collins serenaded the court with a version of the song to show that the flute riff wasn't integral to the greater work.
But Larrikin's counterclaim was that Greg Hamm had blatantly copied the first two bars of Kookaburra. Colin replied that if his friend had lifted Marion Sinclair's melody, it was inadvertent, naive, unconscious. And by the time men at work had recorded the song, it had become unrecognisable. Colin's elderly father agreed. He'd been a singer himself and later owned a music shop.
so he knew a thing or two about songwriting. He was incensed, said Colin. He was getting older and he was getting stressed. Smoke would come out of his ears. The court case dragged on. Hearings, appeals, expert witness after expert witness and the ever-mounting legal bills. And all the time, the scales seemed to be tipping in favour of Larrikin.
Stressed and exasperated, it was all too much for Colin's father. He died in 2010. ''I do feel instinctively it contributed to knocking him off his perch,'' lamented his grieving son. But the copyright case hadn't claimed its last victim. Racked with guilt and worried about losing his home, flute player Greg Ham was observed to be going downhill.
He'd been drinking, and according to one friend, using heroin. It was said the dispute over Down Under had undone him. Copyright laws exist to protect composers. It's very hard to write an ode to joy, a marriage of Figaro, or a baby shark, but very easy to copy them.
Copyright gives creators some ability to stop copycats, and thus an incentive to do the creative work in the first place. And historically, musicians have had a very hard time getting paid for the tunes they've created. Back when there was a music hall every few hundred yards on the streets of Britain, the songs of Joseph Tabra were almost certain to be wafting out.
He was credited with over 7,000 compositions, though claimed he'd written many more. Ting Ting, That's How the Bell Goes, He's Sailing on the Briny Ocean, and Oh, You Little Darling were among his hits. But all were dwarfed by the runaway success of 1892's Daddy Wouldn't Buy Me a Bow Wow. Did I foresee its popularity?
Good gracious, no, said Tabra. Did I make a vast fortune out of it? Yes, eight pounds and odd shillings. Eight pounds would be just a few thousand dollars compared to the wages of the day. That doesn't seem much of a return for creating a song that swept the globe.
It's little wonder then that Joseph Tabra was often penniless, a situation he described euphemistically as being... ..impecuniously embarrassed. The stars who sang his popular songs got rich. They took a cut of ticket sales. And publishers got rich selling the sheet music. But few royalties found their way to people like Joseph Tabra, who wrote the songs in the first place.
Think of a catchy refrain, he said of his creative process. Think of the damn silliest words that will rhyme anyhow. Think of a haunting pretty melody. And there you are. The fortune of your publisher is made. But around the time that Daddy Wouldn't Buy Me a Bow Wow was wowing the Victorians, the music publishers were starting to see their profits being eaten away too.
So-called pirates would dash off copies of the newest hits on cheap paper and employ homeless people to sell them on the streets for pennies. The knock-off sheet music obviously didn't include the printer's address and the street hawkers had no fixed abode. So how could legitimate music publishers sue the pirates?
The Musical Defence League was formed to push for a tightening of the copyright laws and stem the hemorrhaging of profits. The piracy of musical copyright has enormously increased, said one of those proposing a new law, and has now reached such alarming proportions that it is having a paralysing effect on the legitimate trade in musical works.
Unless something was done threatened the Musical Defence League, its members would stop publishing new songs altogether. The composers and publishing houses got their way. Over the course of a decade, new copyright protections came into force, regulating sheet music, piano rolls, wax cylinders, phonograph records and whatever new technology might come next.
And the rights and royalties of composers were also improved. They demand payments for their songs for the rest of their lives and even pass these rights on to their heirs upon death. Good news? Well, there's a sharp trade-off here.
If you make copyright protections very generous to creators, that makes them richer. And it might also encourage more creative activity, especially of really expensive projects such as movies. Although Joseph Debra didn't seem to need much incentive to churn out the hits.
But if copyright protections are too generous to the original creator, they limit our ability to remix and adapt old ideas, or just to enjoy them without paying expensive royalties. As I say, it's a trade-off. The simplest way in which the trade-off bites is the question, how long should copyright protection last?
In Australia, like many countries, the answer is that music copyright lasts 70 years from the date of the composer's death. Kookaburra was written in 1932 and Marian died in 1988. So the copyright lasts until 2058. 126 years. For a song she composed for fun.
Remember the trade-off. We want to give creators a temporary monopoly over their work to ensure that they actually have an incentive to make art. But if that monopoly is too strict or lasts too long, everyone else loses out because they can't enjoy or reuse the art without paying. So what counts as too long?
I'm speaking here as a creative person myself. I benefit from copyright. My first book, The Undercover Economist, was published in 2005 and it's still selling. So personally, I'm happy that copyright lasts more than 20 years. But it doesn't need to last a century. I'd still have written the book and it would still have been published with 20 years of copyright protection. Or even with 10.
But we don't need to be extreme about this. Let's say copyright should last 20 years after the moment of creation. Or 30 years. Or 40. That's plenty. Kookaburra would still have been in the public domain from 1972, almost a decade before Down Under hit the charts. So why are copyright terms so insanely long?
Not because of the artists themselves. Show me the author or the composer lobbying furiously for royalties to last until after their grandchildren are dead. No, it's all about corporate power. Large corporations hoover up artist rights.
These businesses have the scale to enforce their ownership, taking infringers to court, and the clout to lobby governments not to reform the copyright legislation. The implosion of the Beatles upset many music fans who couldn't quite believe that there'd be no more records from the Fab Four.
Concert promoters began to offer huge sums, tens and then hundreds of millions for a reunion. It became a running joke on the TV show Saturday Night Live that it would pay $3,000 for the Beatles to reform. Saturday Night Live eventually aired a sketch with a Beatles parody band, The Ruttles, fronted by Monty Python's Eric Idle.
The Rutles performed a raft of Beatlesque tunes. Ouch, instead of Help, Piggy in the Middle in place of I Am the Walrus. Audiences were delighted, and even the real Beatles appreciated the comic send-up of their work. But this blessing wasn't sufficient to protect the Rutles from the lawyers.
John Lennon advised us that we might have trouble with Get Up and Go, said Juan Rutle, because it sounded so much like Get Back. The Beatles had lost the publishing rights to their songs in the late 60s, and the new owners, ATV Music, certainly didn't see the funny side of the parody All You Need Is Cash.
They lodged a lawsuit, and fearing the cost of fighting it, the Rutles surrendered half of the royalties and added the names Lennon and McCartney to the writing credits. It's brutal, said one Rutle. I couldn't afford to get a lawyer that would go up against these big corporations. The band obviously wanted to sound like the Beatles, but denied directly ripping off Lennon and McCartney.
For centuries, composers have reworked and reinterpreted one another's works, quoting a phrase here, a melody there, and the Rutles said they were no different. The word 'rutle' is in fact a verb, they explained. To 'rutle' is to copy or emulate someone you admire in the music business. The Beatles were Rutles. They 'ruttled' Gene Vincent and Eddie Cochran. Mozart was a Rutle.
Of course, the Rutles never tested this argument before a judge. It was an expensive gamble they weren't willing to take. Men at work, however, had accepted the substantial risk to defend their Rutling of Kookaburra, and the court was about to hand down its final verdict. Cautionary Tales will resume shortly.
I was joking with my producer Jacob the other day, who's one of Pushkin's most valuable employees. I hired him to be my assistant years ago in the most random manner possible. I think he saw a message board posting somewhere and I interviewed him for basically 10 minutes and said, go for it. I made a wild gamble on someone and got incredibly lucky.
But let's be honest, you can't rely on getting lucky when it comes to hiring people. Lightning's not going to strike more than once. You need a system and you need tools. And that's why LinkedIn is so important. LinkedIn is more than just a job board. They help connect you with professionals you can't find anywhere else. Even people who aren't actively looking for a new job.
In a given month, over 70% of LinkedIn users don't visit other leading job sites. So if you're not looking on LinkedIn, you're looking in the wrong place. Hire professionals like a professional and post your job for free at linkedin.com slash gladwell. That's linkedin.com slash gladwell to post your job for free. Terms and conditions apply.
Cautionary Tales is proudly sponsored by Amica Insurance. As Amica says, empathy is our best policy. That's why they'll go above and beyond to tailor your insurance coverage to best fit your needs. Whether you're on the road, at home, or travelling along life's journey, their friendly and knowledgeable representatives will work with you to ensure you have the right coverage in place. Amica will provide you with peace of mind.
Go to ameca.com and get a quote today. Trust isn't just earned, it's demanded. Whether you're a startup founder navigating your first audit or a seasoned security professional scaling your GRC program, proving your commitment to security has never been more critical or more complex. That's where Vanta comes in.
Businesses use Vanta to establish trust by automating compliance needs over 35 frameworks, like SOC 2 and ISO 27001, centralize security workflows, complete questionnaires up to five times faster, and proactively manage vendor risk.
Vanta can help you start or scale your security program by connecting you with auditors and experts to conduct your audit and set up your security program quickly. Plus, with automation and AI throughout the platform, Vanta gives you time back so you can focus on building your company.
Join over 9,000 global companies like Atlassian, Quora, and Factory who use Vanta to manage risk and prove security in real time. For a limited time, our audience gets $1,000 off Vanta at vanta.com slash special. That's V-A-N-T-A dot com slash special for $1,000 off. I've argued that copyright lasts too long, but the case of the Rutles suggests another problem.
Maybe copyright protection is also too broad. Economists sometimes talk about the breadth or the height of intellectual property protection, which in this case means how much of Kookaburra can you take and how radically do you have to transform it before you're in the clear? These are more complicated questions than simply asking how long copyright should last.
which was why Down Under ended up in court and why the proceedings dragged on for so long. And our attitudes to copying aren't just a matter for the courts. They're a matter of culture too, and I think we fuss too much about copying. Books, films and songs can be shallow and derivative without plagiarising.
While a creative work that does contain plagiarism can still be deep and original, the truth is that there's copying and then there's copying. I'm a great admirer of Malcolm Gladwell's writing. If I were to print 10,000 copies of his new book, Revenge of the Tipping Point, sell them and keep the revenue, I'd be committing one form of intellectual property theft, indirectly stealing money from him.
If instead I printed, by Tim Harford, on the cover, I'd be committing a different form of mischief, stealing the credit as well as the profits. Or there's a third thing I could do. I could add chunks of his writing to my own. That seems crazy, but stranger things have happened.
20 years ago, a Broadway play was attracting praise and a Tony nomination for its wrenchingly authentic portrayal of what makes a murderer. The reason for the realism was soon revealed. The playwright had lifted long, uncredited passages from a magazine profile of a real psychiatrist who studied killers. That profile was by Malcolm Gladwell.
The psychiatrist was enraged and considering legal action, and she enlisted Malcolm to back her case. He was initially helpful, until he read the script for himself. "'I found it breathtaking,' he said. "'Instead of feeling that my words had been taken from me, "'I felt that they had become part of some grander cause.'
Around 675 of the article's words had been taken without Malcolm's permission. These words were the result of his work and his craft. The sentences and paragraphs they created, lodging ideas in readers' minds, belonged to Malcolm. And now a hit play was benefiting from them, without crediting or compensating him.
A savvier writer would have rewritten the quotes for me so that their origin was no longer recognisable. But how would I have been better off if she had disguised the source of her inspiration? Many people were furious on Malcolm's behalf. Having originally been fated, the playwright was now raked over the coals for intellectual thievery. It feels absolutely terrible, she told Malcolm. I just didn't think I was doing the wrong thing.
And Malcolm wasn't so sure she had. The furore of the play had given him a chance to think about where his own ideas had come from. From the books and articles he'd read, speeches he'd heard, films he'd seen. Malcolm admitted that some of his phrasing used in the play was pretty similar to works already in existence. One formation of words sounded very close to something Gandhi had once said. The dishonesty of the plagiarism fundamentalists...
is to encourage us to pretend that these chains of influence and evolution do not exist and that a writer's words have a virgin birth and an eternal life. Sadly, many of the current copyright laws conform to the thinking of these plagiarism fundamentalists. And it was to these standards that Men at Work's Down Under was being judged. It's a big win for the underdog, said a lawyer when the judgment was finally read.
He was acting on behalf of Norm Lurie and Larrikin Music, men at work had lost. Be it intentional or subconscious, Greg Hamm's flute riff was an infringement of Larrikin's ownership of Kookaburra, and the firm was owed damages.
"Of course it would be disingenuous for me to say that there wasn't a financial aspect involved," said a delighted Norm Ury. "But you could just as easily say what has won out is the importance of checking before using other people's copyrights." One person who could think of little else in the wake of the ruling was the flute player Greg Hamm. He felt crushing guilt that he'd landed his bandmates in a five-year legal battle.
and tried to blot it out with drink and drugs. Having sold his long-time home, he'd downsized to help settle the bills. It was in this more modest apartment that Greg was found dead. He'd suffered a heart attack, and Men at Work's lead singer Colin Hay angrily blamed the stress of the court case. It's people you love who you're losing over litigation based on greed and opportunism.
So what did Norm Lurie and Larrikin make from suing Men at Work? They'd wanted 60% of all the profits from Down Under, and the judge gave them 5%. And then, only on money earned since 2002, not all the way back to Men at Work's 1980s heyday. It was deemed that a greater share would have been excessive, overreaching and unrealistic.
Under copyright law, Larroquin's claim of infringement had cleared the legal bar to win the case, but the judges spoke of their disquiet at having to find against men at work. The modest damages awarded to Larroquin were perhaps a warning to vexatious litigants that they should find a more amicable alternative to launching legal action.
It's thought this 5% settlement amounted to only around $100,000. Both sides had spent millions in legal fees. So while men at work had lost the case, there were really no winners, aside from the lawyers. If we don't like that result, maybe we should think about writing a more sensible copyright law.
But there is one final surprising casualty in this sorry tale. As one of Australia's most beloved pop stars, Colin Hay had been a guest on the quiz Spicks and Specks. He and the host, Adam Hills, had become friends. We were actually quite close, said Hills. We even house-sat for the singer.
When Spicks and Specks sparked the devastating legal dispute, some Men at Work fans held Hills directly responsible. I got a lot of pretty abusive stuff on Facebook, the TV star admits. It's such a weird thing to have happened that a throwaway question on a music quiz show leads to a court case.
It's such an iconic, beloved Australian song, but I'll never hear it without knowing that I've got this awful connection to it. But it's the impact on his relationship with Men At Work's singer that most upsets Adam Hills. I haven't spoken to Colin for ages. It all got weird between us.
Exhausted and embittered by the whole affair, Colin Hay found performing Down Under on stage an increasingly harrowing and depressing experience. He'd launch into the hit and immediately be transported back to the court case. That is, until one evening. Playing to a crowd of 25,000 people, all dancing and gleefully singing along,
Colin had an epiphany. Looking out across the audience, he suddenly thought, they can't touch this. For a full list of our sources, see the show notes at timharford.com. Cautionary Tales is written by me, Tim Harford, with Andrew Wright, Alice Fiennes and Ryan Dilley. It's produced by Alice Fiennes and Marilyn Rust.
The sound design and original music are the work of Pascal Wise. Additional sound design is by Carlos San Juan at Brain Audio. Ben Nadaf-Haffrey edited the scripts.
The show features the voice talents of Melanie Guttridge, Stella Harford, Oliver Hembrough, Sarah Jopp, Masaya Munro, Jamal Westman and Rufus Wright. The show also wouldn't have been possible without the work of Jacob Weisberg, Greta Cohn, Sarah Nix, Eric Sandler, Carrie Brody, Christina Sullivan, Keira Posey and Owen Miller.
Cautionary Tales is a production of Pushkin Industries. It's recorded at Wardour Studios in London by Tom Berry. If you like the show, please remember to share, rate and review. It really makes a difference to us. And if you want to hear the show ad-free, sign up to Pushkin Plus on the show page on Apple Podcasts or at pushkin.fm slash plus.
CBS Monday, February 24th. Introducing the new daytime drama, Beyond the Gates. Welcome to Fairmont Crest Estates, where the wealthy and glamorous Dupree family rules the community with poise and sophistication. That is, until a cheating husband and his trophy wife start stirring up trouble. Find out what happens beyond these majestic gates and behind closed doors where scandal, romance,
Romance, betrayal, passion, secrets, and revenge await. CBS Daytime is about to get soapier. The new daytime drama Beyond the Gates premieres CBS Monday, February 24th and streaming on Paramount+. During tax season, your sensitive info does a lot of traveling to places you can't control. Stopping off at payroll, your accountant or tax preparer, and countless other data centers on its way to the IRS.
Any of them can expose you to identity theft because they all have the info on your W-2, just the ticket for criminals to steal your identity. No wonder the IRS reported tax fraud due to identity theft went up 20% last year. You need LifeLock. They monitor millions of data points per second and alert you to threats you could miss. If your identity is stolen, LifeLock's U.S.-based restoration specialists will fix it, backed by the million-dollar protection package. And restoration is guaranteed, or your money back.
Don't let identity thieves take you for a ride. Get LifeLock protection for tax season and beyond. Join now and save up to 40% your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code IHEART or go to lifelock.com slash IHEART for 40% off. Terms apply. Kroger brand products have the great taste you'll celebrate. That's why over 40 million people choose Kroger brand products, making them a true crowd pleaser.
And with quality guaranteed, you'll love your choice or get your money back. Score Kroger brand products with savings you can cheer for and great taste you can't resist. Kroger. Fresh for everyone.