Musk's $56B Payday Goes Poof: Judge Slaps Down Tesla CEO While Lawyers Get $345M Consolation Prize
Elon Musk Podcast
Deep Dive
Why did Judge McCormick reject Elon Musk's $56 billion Tesla compensation package?
Judge McCormick found that the approval process was fundamentally flawed due to Musk's position as a controlling shareholder, which compromised the board's independence and created potential conflicts of interest.
How much did the victorious attorneys receive in fees after challenging Musk's compensation package?
The attorneys were awarded $345 million, significantly less than the $5.6 billion they initially requested.
What was the key issue in Richard Tornetta's 2018 lawsuit against Tesla?
Tornetta alleged that Musk exerted undue influence over Tesla's board during the creation of the compensation package, and that shareholders received misleading information before its approval.
How did Tesla's board attempt to salvage Musk's compensation package after the initial ruling?
The board put the compensation package to another shareholder vote in June 2024, which received 72% approval, but Judge McCormick did not reverse her decision.
What was the total number of hours logged by the attorneys in the Tesla compensation case?
The legal team logged 19,499.95 hours, conducting extensive investigations, document discovery, and 17 depositions.
What multiplier was applied to the attorneys' hours to determine their fee award?
The final award represented a 25.3 multiplier of the hours worked by the legal team.
What were the performance milestones in Musk's original compensation package?
The package included 12 performance milestones, starting with Tesla's market capitalization reaching $100 billion and increasing by $50 billion increments, culminating in a $650 billion target for full vesting.
How did Elon Musk respond to the ruling on his compensation package?
Musk stated on X that shareholders should control company votes, not judges, expressing dissatisfaction with the court's decision.
What are Tesla's plans following the ruling?
Tesla announced plans to appeal the decision to the Delaware Supreme Court, aiming to challenge the ruling's implications for Delaware corporate law.
What broader implications does Judge McCormick's ruling have for corporate governance?
The ruling sets new standards for executive compensation and legal fees in high-stakes litigation, emphasizing the importance of board independence and procedural fairness in corporate governance.
- Judge Kathleen McCormick rejected Elon Musk's $56 billion Tesla compensation package.
- Attorneys awarded $345 million in fees (instead of the requested $5.6 billion).
- The ruling cites flaws in the approval process and questions board independence.
Shownotes Transcript