Musk's $56B Payday Goes Poof: Judge Slaps Down Tesla CEO While Lawyers Get $345M Consolation Prize
07:13 Share

This episode is brought to you by Amazon Prime. There's nothing sweeter than bacon cookies during the holidays. With Prime, I get all my ingredients delivered right to my door, fast and free. No last minute store trips needed. And of course, I blast my favorite holiday playlist on Amazon Music. It's the ultimate soundtrack for creating unforgettable memories. From streaming to shopping, it's on Prime. Visit Amazon.com slash Prime to get more out of whatever you're into.

Hey, I'm Ryan Reynolds. Recently, I asked Mint Mobile's legal team if big wireless companies are allowed to raise prices due to inflation. They said yes. And then when I asked if raising prices technically violates those onerous two-year contracts, they said, what the f*** are you talking about, you insane Hollywood a**hole?

So to recap, we're cutting the price of Mint Unlimited from $30 a month to just $15 a month. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. $45 upfront for three months plus taxes and fees. Promote it for new customers for a limited time. Unlimited more than 40 gigabytes per month. Slows. Full terms at mintmobile.com.

Delaware Chancery Court Judge Kathleen McCormick struck down Elon Musk's $56 billion Tesla compensation package for the second time on Monday, while simultaneously addressing an extraordinary request from the victorious attorneys. The legal team sought $5.6 billion in fees for their successful challenge to Musk's pay structure, but McCormick awarded them $345 million instead, payable in cash or in Tesla shares.

So the legal saga traces its origins to 2018 when Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta filed a lawsuit challenging the unprecedented compensation agreement.

Now, Tornetta's lawsuit alleged that Musk wielded undue influence over Tesla's board during the creation of the pay package, and the shareholders received misleading information before approving the plan. The compensation structure consisted of 12 performance milestones, each unlocking additional Tesla shares as the company's value increased.

Judge McCormick's initial ruling in January of 2024 determined the process leading to the plan's approval was fundamentally flawed. She specifically cited Musk's position as a controlling shareholder at Tesla created potential conflicts of interest that compromised the board's independence. Now, McCormick wrote that a CEO's celebrity status can make even truly independent directors, quote, unduly differential.

and created a distortion field that interferes with proper oversight. Tesla's board attempted to salvage the compensation package by putting it to another shareholder vote in June of 2024. The measure received 72% approval from shareholders, demonstrating strong support for maintaining Musk's incentive structure. However, McCormick remained unconfirmed.

convinced, explaining that no Delaware court had ever reversed its judgment based on a post-trial stockholder vote.

Now, the judge's latest ruling addressed both the compensation package and the attorney's fee request with careful consideration of legal precedent and fairness principles. McCormick acknowledged the legal team's substantial work, noting they logged 19,499.95 hours, conducted extensive investigations, managed document discovery, and took 17 depositions while facing some of the best law firms in the country.

Now, the attorneys representing Tornetta came from three prominent firms, Bernstein, Littowitz, Berger & Grossman, LLP, Andrews & Springer, LLC, and Friedman, Oster & Totell, PLLC. And their track record of securing major recoveries in Delaware courts and successfully managing high-stakes litigation through trial and appeal contributed to McCormick's decision on their fee award.

Tesla's defense team proposed a considerably lower fee award of $54.5 million. McCormick found middle ground, determining that while the plaintiff's attorney's mythology was sound, awarding $5.6 billion would constitute an unjustifiable windfall. The final award represents a 25.3 multiplier of the hours worked by the legal team.

Now, the compensation package's original structure reflected Tesla's ambitious growth targets. The first milestone required Tesla's market capitalization to reach $100 billion, with subsequent milestones demanding additional $50 billion increments. The company needed to achieve a $650 billion market value for Musk to fully vest in the award.

And Tesla has experienced both triumphs and challenges since the package's implementation. The company's value has surpassed $1 trillion, far exceeding the original targets. However, recent headwinds include slowing electric vehicle sales growth and increased regulatory scrutiny. Now, Musk's response to the ruling came through X.

where he stated shareholders should control company votes, not judges. Tesla echoed this sentiment, posting that the ruling suggests judges and plaintiffs' lawyers run Delaware companies rather than their rightful owners, the shareholders.

Now, the legal team's victory marks a notable shift in corporate governance oversight. Bernstein, Littowitz, Berger, and Grossman expressed dissatisfaction with both the ruling and fee resolution while maintaining readiness to defend the decision if appealed to the Delaware court system.

The case highlights fundamental questions about executive compensation and corporate governance. McCormick's ruling suggests that even with shareholder approval, compensation packages must withstand scrutiny regarding the independence of board decisions and fairness to all stakeholders.

Tesla announced plans to appeal the decision to the Delaware Supreme Court. The appeal process could establish important precedents for future executive compensation cases and the weight given to post-trial shareholder votes in Delaware corporate law. Legal experts know that the timing of McCormick's decision coincides with broader discussions about executive compensation and corporate accountability. The ruling may influence how other companies structure their executive pay packages and

and handle board oversight responsibilities. This case demonstrates the complexity of balancing shareholder interests with executive incentives. While Tesla achieved remarkable growth under Musk's leadership, the court determined that procedural fairness and board independence cannot be compromised, regardless of business success.

Questions remain about how Tesla will structure future compensation for Musk. McCormick's ruling leaves room for the board to create a new package, provided it follows proper procedures and maintains independence from Musk's influence. And attorneys for Tesla shareholders said that their commitment to defending the court's decision through any appeals process, suggesting this legal battle may continue to shape corporate governance standards in Delaware courts for decades to come.

Empower your business or digital agency with Bluehost, trusted by over 5 million WordPress users globally. Bluehost features top-to-bottom hosting optimizations designed specifically for WordPress, giving you 24-7 access to a team of experts for support, plus thousands of WordPress help articles. So if you want to streamline WordPress website creation with intuitive controls and premium support, choose Bluehost, powering over 2 million websites worldwide.

McCormick's dual rulings on the compensation package and attorney fees establish clear boundaries for executive pay and legal compensation in corporate litigation while reinforcing the court's rule in maintaining proper corporate governance standards.

Now, the Delaware court's rejection of both Musk's compensation package and the attorney's multi-billion dollar fee request reinforces judicial authority over corporate governance while establishing new standards for executive pay and legal compensation in high stakes corporate litigation.

Now, thank you so much for watching the show today or listening. If you're on a podcast platform, whatever platform you're on right now, please take a second and hit the subscribe button or the follow button. And also, if you're on YouTube, hit the like button and leave a comment wherever you are in the in the universe. They're listening to this. So please take care of yourselves and each other. And I'll see you in the next one. Where are we at? Seven minutes.