Musk’s X Sues New York Over Law Requiring Disclosure of Hate Speech Policies
06:07 Share

At Sierra, discover great deals on top brand workout gear, like high-quality walking shoes, which might lead to another discovery. 40,000 steps, baby! Who's on top now, Karen? You've taken the office step challenge a step too far. Don't worry, though. Sierra also has yoga gear. It might be a good place to find your zen. Discover top brands at unexpectedly low prices. Sierra, let's get moving. So,

Summer is coming right to your door. With Target Circle 360, get all the season go-tos at home with same-day delivery. Snacks for the pool party? Delivered. Sun lotion and towels for a beach day? Delivered. Pillows and lights to deck out the deck? That too. Delivered. Just when you want them. Summer your way, quick and easy. Join now and get all the summer fun delivered right to your home with Target Circle 360. Membership required. Subject to terms and conditions. Applies to orders over $35.

Savor every last drop of summer with Starbucks. From bold refreshers to rich cold brews, the sunniest season only gets better with a handcrafted ice beverage in your hand. Available for a limited time. Your summer favorites are ready at Starbucks. Hey everybody, welcome back to the Elon Musk Podcast. This is a show where we discuss the critical crossroads that shape SpaceX, Tesla, X, The Boring Company, and Neuralink. I'm your host, Will Walden.

Elon Musk's social media platform X has filed a lawsuit against New York State this week challenging a law that demands social media companies disclose how they handle hate speech, extremism, and other divisive content. The core question that emerges is whether the government can compel platforms to reveal their moderation practices without actually violating constitutional protections.

X argues that this law undermines free speech rights and forces platforms to publish information about sensitive and controversial speech that falls under First Amendment protections. Now, this legal clash marks another chapter in Elon Musk's ongoing battle against regulatory oversight of his platform's content policies.

X submitted the lawsuit on Tuesday in a New York federal court. The company, which Musk acquired in 2022 when it was still known as Twitter, claims that New York law intrudes on free expression. The law in question, known as the Stop Hiding Hate Act, passed in December. It requires social media companies to detail the steps they take to curb hate on their platforms and to report progress of these efforts.

X states that the law imposes unconstitutional demands by effectively pressuring platforms to regulate speech in a way that should remain beyond government reach. Now, New York Attorney General Letitia James, who holds responsibility for enforcing the Stop Hiding Hate Act, is the named defendant in the lawsuit. James has not issued a public statement.

comment regarding the suit as of Tuesday and the law's sponsor, Senator Brad Hoylman Seigel and assembly member Grace Lee described platforms like X as environments where hate speech thrives. They said that X and other companies have repeatedly failed to inform the public about their policies on hate and misinformation. They maintain that the law does not infringe on first amendment rights.

X's complaint points to a broader national debate about the government's role in regulating digital speech. The company asserts that determining the boundaries of acceptable content is a matter of ongoing debate among reasonable people and that the government has no place in this discussion. X argues that its moderation decisions, including what it chooses to report, fall under its protected right to free speech. The lawsuit seeks to block the state from enforcing the law.

And X references its earlier legal victory in California as a precedent. Nine months ago, the company successfully halted the enforcement of a California law requiring large social media firms to file reports on their moderation practices. X claims that New York legislatures failed to adjust the language of their law even after the California statute was largely invalidated in court.

The company criticizes this as a refusal to consider the constitutional flaws identified in similar legislation. The Hoover Dam wasn't built in a day and the GMC Sierra lineup wasn't built overnight. Like every American achievement, building the Sierra 1500 heavy duty and EV was the result of dedication, a dedication to mastering the art of engineering. That's what this country has done for 250 years.

and what GMC has done for over 100. We are professional grade. Visit GMC.com to learn more. Assembled in Flint and Hamtron, Michigan and Fort Wayne, Indiana of U.S. and globally sourced parts.

The legal dispute comes as Americans increasingly rely on platforms like X for news consumption. Data from the Reuters Institute shows that a majority of Americans get their news from social media, with X being a key source, and this dependence on platforms amplifies the stakes of how content moderation is handled. Musk's platform maintains that revealing its policies in detail could chill free speech by inviting government interference in editorial decisions.

And Musk has made sweeping changes to X's content policies since taking over the platform. According to analysis by Professor Laura Edelson of Northeastern University, Musk rolled back many of the rules that defined acceptable behavior on X. She notes that Musk also reduced the platform's investment in enforcement resources. And as a result, she explains that while official rules on spam have not changed...

Users now encounter much more spam than before. This shift in approach has drawn attention from lawmakers and advocacy groups concerned about rising hate speech and misinformation. And the lawsuit also recalls Musk's earlier legal fight with a research organization that tracked hate on X. Last year, a federal judge dismissed this case, citing with the group that documented increases in harmful content.

That defeat and the current lawsuit signal Musk's ongoing legal strategy to challenge external scrutiny and regulation of his platform. X's legal challenge against New York adds to a growing list of confrontations between Musk's companies and state-level regulators. Each case raises important questions about how much authority states can exercise over private digital platforms and where the line lies between regulation and censorship.

The outcome of this case will determine whether New York can force social media companies to disclose content moderation practices without violating free speech rights.

And the lawsuit sets up a direct legal contest or the balance between free expression and government accountability for hate speech online. If you're on a platform that has comments on it, make sure to leave a comment about what you think about this. Are they impeding on X's free speech rights? Is this a first amendment thing? Or is this Elon Musk trying to keep control over X and trying to keep control over the

Discussions on X. Let me know in the comments on your platform.

Hey, thank you so much for listening today. I really do appreciate your support. If you could take a second and hit the subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast platform that you're listening on right now, I'd greatly appreciate it. It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never miss an episode. And each episode is about 10 minutes or less to get you caught up quickly. And please, if you want to support the show even more, go to patreon.com slash stage zero.

And please take care of yourselves and each other, and I'll see you tomorrow.