We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode From data breach scandal to AI darling, with Snowflake’s CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy

From data breach scandal to AI darling, with Snowflake’s CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy

2025/4/1
logo of podcast Masters of Scale

Masters of Scale

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
J
Jeff Berman
S
Sridhar Ramaswamy
Topics
Jeff Berman: 我认为区分AI领域的真实和炒作非常困难,行业缺乏透明度,例如没有公开讨论幻觉率或企业级标准。区分AI领域的真实和炒作是商业领袖面临的最大挑战。 Sridhar Ramaswamy: 我第一年担任CEO经历了超出预期的戏剧性事件,包括Snowflake公司上市、股价下跌和数据泄露事件,但我对快速变化感到兴奋。我坚信应该专注于能够产生影响的事情,而不是纠结于短期内无法改变的事情。在谷歌的工作中,我构建了高度可靠的系统,这与Snowflake的业务有相似之处,都需要与客户建立深厚关系,只不过Snowflake主要与CIO和首席数据官打交道。Snowflake是世界上最重要企业最重要数据的存储地,并通过AI接口使数据更易访问。Snowflake专注于数据产品,并通过与多个基础模型公司合作来提供AI服务,而不是自己开发基础模型。对DeepSeek的担忧主要在于数据传输到中国的问题,但Snowflake托管DeepSeek模型本身不会造成安全风险。更廉价、更快速的模型能够提高Snowflake数据的价值,促进更广泛的AI采用。“智能代理AI”是一个被广泛误用和误解的概念,其承诺在于将不同的系统连接起来以执行更复杂的任务。Snowflake的数据泄露事件并非由于软件漏洞,而是客户账户问题,这强调了安全责任的共享性。数据泄露事件虽然令人不快,但也促使Snowflake改进安全措施和客户关系。“作战室”会议旨在促进不同团队(例如产品工程、营销和销售)之间的紧密协作,尤其是在推出新产品时。Snowflake对AI初创公司的投资、AI人才培养计划以及AI中心建设,旨在促进AI生态系统的发展。美国需要解决民众的繁荣感问题,才能更好地应对移民问题,因为只有在繁荣的基础上才能有慷慨。企业应该专注于自身优势,谨慎地选择创新领域,并做好失败的准备。区分AI领域的真实和炒作是企业领导者面临的最大挑战,AI行业缺乏透明度加剧了这一问题。 Bob Safian: 作为一名听众,我对Sridhar Ramaswamy的观点和Snowflake公司的发展历程印象深刻。

Deep Dive

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Hey folks, Jeff Berman here. If your business is driving innovation, delivering exceptional experiences, or making a real impact on society, or maybe all three, we want you to apply for the Masters of Scale Business Awards. These awards celebrate bold organizations of all sizes and across all industries. Award recipients don't just get a trophy, although yes, there are trophies.

They get a spotlight at the Masters of Scale Summit and a seat at the table with the very best in business. Don't wait. Head to mastersofscale.com slash businessawards dash apply. That's mastersofscale.com slash businessawards dash apply.

Just separating out what is real from what is hype, I think, is very hard. And I don't think the AI industry helps itself with things like not talking about hallucination rates or not talking about what does it take for something to truly be enterprise grade. There's a little bit of a, look, Ma, it's so cool kind of attitude there.

There is a maturity process that is going to happen. Figuring out what is real from what is hype is the biggest challenge that business leaders face today.

That's Sridhar Ramaswamy, CEO of the cloud storage platform Snowflake. It's been a wild few years for Snowflake, from a record-breaking IPO to a plummeting stock price to a data breach scandal. Sridhar took over as CEO in the heat of the turmoil and has helped steady the ship in part because of the pandemic.

by leaning into AI in a very specific way. Today, he shares lessons from the company's in-process turnaround, including insights behind high-profile partnership with OpenAI and Anthropic, why Snowflake embraced China's DeepSeq early, and how the buzz around agentic AI is being broadly misunderstood. There's a lot to cover, so let's get to it. I'm Bob Safian, and this is Rapid Response. ♪

I'm Bob Safi, and I'm here with Sridhar Ramaswamy, CEO of cloud data platform Snowflake. Sridhar, it's great to see you. It's wonderful to see you, Bob.

Snowflake has been on quite a roller coaster. It had the biggest software IPO ever in 2020, followed by a somewhat dramatic stock fall. You took over as CEO a year ago and almost immediately faced scrutiny related to a high-tech data breach. Yet you've also been in the heart of the hottest

business arena ever, AI. Snowflake was one of the first American companies to tap into DeepSeek, the China-based open source AI. It's all kind of head spinning. How's it going? Like, has your first year as CEO been what you expected? The first year has been amazing. A little bit more than what I expected in terms of drama. But this is a time of rapid change and I could not be more excited.

I had a guest on the show recently who confided that a lot of CEOs are kind of paralyzed right now by sort of external uncertainties in the world, you know, shifting tariffs and regulations and executive orders. How do you deal with and think about the sort of the environment and all the changes relative to sort of the things that you can control yourself?

One of my firm beliefs in life is that you need to focus on the things that you're going to have an impact on. There are many things that, let's face it, we are simply not going to have any impact on. Obsessing about unchangeable things in the short term is the recipe for being uncertain about life. There is a lot of macro uncertainty.

businesses will react and we will have to worry, for example, if the stock market keeps going down or if the business climate gets worse, it will have an impact on Snowflake. But so far, it's been heads down, get great product work done, get great customer deployments done. We first met when you were at Google, you were leading advertising and commerce, and then you started a search engine company, Neva, that was ultimately acquired by Snowflakes. Both of those businesses were more

content-focused and ultimately consumer-oriented than Snowflake. What's different about a full-on B2B business? There are many things that are similar in the sense that you make money off of deep relationships with your customers. Absolutely, commerce, search was a consumer business.

but Google has an amazing enterprise business. It's called Ads. It predates, you know, the Google Cloud. And what was unique about Google, of course, was that a massive amount of revenue on Google Ads is completely self-serve. It's quite magical. 50% of this absurd amount of revenue that Google makes is without ever talking to people. It's all done via web interface. It was quite magical. But Google,

The core of what I did at Google, which is build highly reliable systems that never went down. And for us, that was all about money. If search ads went down, you were literally losing thousands of dollars every single second. That's enough motivation to not bring stuff down. And then work the relationships on the enterprise side. There is a lot of commonality to it, but obviously,

It is a new set of stakeholders. Google mostly dealt with CMOs. Here, we mostly deal with CIOs and chief data officers. And thanks to AI, quite a bit of CEOs as well. And so it's building up a new network of relationships. But, you know, that's good, honest work. And learning to cram 20 people's names into your head is a good exercise now, as it was 10 years ago. It's good fun, man.

You recently said that Snowflake is the most consequential data and AI company in the world. That is an ambitious assertion, especially for a business that at least previously was known as a data storage company. How do you back up that claim? The most important data for the most important enterprises in the world is already stored on Snowflake. Snowflake is the gold standard for analytics. We have something like

700 odd global 2000 companies that are on Snowflake. And if you exclude the folks from China that we are not even going after, that is 700 something out of 1600. And they all put their most important priced information on top of Snowflake.

Large public companies close their books every month on top of Snowflake. Financial institutions share data with each other. Snowflake is the beating heart of the, at least the U.S. financial system in terms of how data moves from place to place. And what we have done over the past year

is make AI a natural addition to how Snowflake operates. I think we are positioned incredibly well to continue what we did for data, which is make data now available through AI interfaces, through conversational interfaces, for these things to be tied, strung together into workflows that are increasingly going to serve higher level business function.

And that's the reason for asserting that we are the most consequential enterprise AI and data company. Is there a bit of Benioff there? You know, there are good qualities to mark.

I mentioned at the beginning that Snowflake was one of the first US companies to adopt DeepSeek. You're also the only data platform, a big one, to offer models from both OpenAI and Anthropic. What did you see in DeepSeek? And second, why have you leaned into having multiple models available?

Our strength is as a data platform. We are not a foundation model company. And honestly, most companies have no business of pretending that they are foundation model companies. It takes very specialized expertise, incredible talent density, and a very, very big wallet.

And so for this, we decided to go the way of partnerships. We collaborate with a lot of folks. We focus on developing data products, which in my mind is the place where value is going to be realized.

When people think about OpenAI, they think, ah, these are the people that make the foundation models. No, no, no. OpenAI is an amazing product company. ChatGPT is a legitimate product. It is going to approach the pantheon of like the greats, the products that have a billion plus users.

And so helping people get value from models and the data that Snowflake has is what we are about, and hence the leaning into heavy partnerships. Things like hosting DeepSea quickly, you know, that's just a little bit of making sure that you can still run the 100-meter sprint in 10 seconds. It was a challenge. It was an amazing model. We had it out in two days flat.

There was a lot of anxiety about DeepSeek. You don't necessarily feel that same kind of anxiety, or even if you do, you feel like you have to have it available. Let's break that anxiety down. There are many parts of DeepSeek. One is the open source model. DeepSeek also offers services on servers that are hosted in China. But if you use their app, for example, everything that you are typing in is getting sent to China.

Now, without getting too much into geopolitics, people will rightfully say that sending business data to China is a bad idea. It's the same kind of fear that we have about TikTok. Hosting the deep-seek model does not introduce any kind of security compromise. We host it. We take security and risk management very seriously. Us hosting deep-seek did not cause issues like that.

Any anxiety about, "Oh, Deep-sea can do things so much more cheaply than OpenAI. There are cheaper, faster ways to build these models."

See, that's the part of it that I actually like. That's not anxiety. And the reason I like that is because if there are highly capable models that are freely available, the value of the data that is in Snowflake goes up. It doesn't go down. The value of the model companies go down and they have to innovate even harder. But innovation is a good thing for all of us. The cheaper that models get, the more broadly adoption there is

the more benefit that we as society are going to get. And certainly, Snowflake as a business, hosting these models and running it ourselves without paying a toll, let's face it, you know, it can feel like that sometimes, to a bunch of other parties is honestly a good thing. Competition is absolutely a good thing. The big buzz in Silicon Valley today is around so-called agentic AI.

Now, there's also some skepticism that the buzz doesn't match use cases yet, that customers aren't using AI agents as much as other simpler AI tools and chatbots. Can you quickly define for folks who may not know sort of what agentic AI is and then kind of explain why the buzz and the reality aren't matching up or at least not yet? Agentic AI is a...

vastly misused, misunderstood kind of word. It can honestly mean anything. I talked to a bunch of search companies, friends of mine that have started companies, and they make, honest to goodness, like a search index that you can use to power a chatbot. And they pretty much will look at me in the face and say, Sridhar, we are powering agent TKI. That's what we do for a living. And I go, wait, you make a search index. But

be that as may be, I think the promise is that

Language models are very good at coming up with plans for tasks. If you ask them a question, I'm a bank, I have access to portfolios of stock that my customer owns. I want to create a report for Bob about his portfolio. What should I do? It'll come up with a very good plan of, okay, go talk to this table, get a list of all the tickers that Bob owns, get additional information about these, blend the two, produce a great report for him.

At its core, agentic AI is about stringing together different systems, also AI-based, to do something larger than what any individual system can do. Of course, you can imagine in the same example that I gave you that there is also access to a news corpus, some API that can get news about the different stocks that are in your folder.

The same agent can go search for news that has happened over the past three days. And if something is deemed worthy enough, there's a little bit of coding involved in defining worthy enough. It can say, hey, Bob, this is the current status of your portfolio. These are the movements in the fundamental metrics you care about. And here are top 10 articles about the companies that you have in your portfolio in case you're interested in reading.

What I've described here is a very simple agent tech system that is able to talk to multiple sources, make a little bit of decisions about what is worthwhile news to show to you versus not. But you can imagine this getting more complicated. I tell people, I dream of the day when I can have an agent talk to both united.com and Southwest to figure out what flight I should take. Right now, I have to do stuff like that manually.

So I think those are coming. These are also pretty hard problems, Bob. It all feels like it's just moving so fast. Sort of like what's the next thing? I mean, because you have to plan further out to build these products and yet it's hard to know what's going to come next.

That's life in AI. It is pretty hard to keep up. But on the other hand, the value that some of these tools can create is truly extraordinary. I've been using Gemini Deep Research. I use ChatGPT Deep Research. And the amount of value that I can get out of them is astounding.

I think tools like that are here to stay. We are driving the adoption of those tools all across our sales teams because right now, before you meet a customer, for example, it is literally two minutes of work to be able to say, give me recent news about this customer. If there is any update to their financial performance, tell me about it. And if this person I am meeting has been in the news, give that to me as well. And like a minute later, you have all of that in front of you, the briefing ready. I

I think that's pretty magical. Embracing change absolutely is very hard. I struggle with it. My team struggles with it. It's one of those things that you just have to accept that it is uncomfortable and, you know, that becomes a way of life.

Sridhar is definitely living life in AI. I appreciate his acknowledgement that he struggles with the pace of change, that it makes him uncomfortable. Of course, he's had plenty of experience being uncomfortable, including around last year's big data breach. We'll talk about that and more after the break. Stay with us. Meet Romeo Regali, a Capital One business customer and chef and CEO of Roz, a plant-based restaurant with two locations in New York.

We started talking about our own restaurant. I don't know if she thought I was serious, but she said, you know, let's just do it. Let's just start our own brand from scratch. Romeo's recalling the moment when he and his wife and co-founder Milka Regali decided to take a leap of faith. I started working as a server at Milka's mom's restaurant. I fell in love so much with the industry, and that's what sparked it.

Romeo and Milka weren't certain how they would bring their dream to fruition. But they were certain of one thing, their passion. We knew we had a vision and we found a space. We had to gut the entire space and build everything from scratch. The kitchen, gas piping, and the restroom, the sound system, everything. We really believed every detail matters.

As they broke ground on their first ROS location, Romeo and Milka soon faced the financial reality of building something from scratch. They looked to Capital One Business to help navigate the fiscal burden of making their dreams come true. We used a Spark Cash Plus card from Capital One. The no preset spending limit really had a big role in helping us finish the project. We're very happy with what we have accomplished. We want to expand more.

To learn more, go to CapitalOne.com slash business cards. At Masters of Scale, we talk a lot about innovation. It's an essential skill that all industry leaders absolutely have to develop. Our community looks to us to stay ahead on the latest trends in commerce. And more and more, we hear of businesses turning to Ohio. That's right, Ohio.

JobsOhio isn't just an economic development organization, they're matchmakers for innovation. From talent acquisition to site selection to infrastructure development, JobsOhio exists to empower world-class corporations, entrepreneurs, and talented individuals to build their businesses and their careers in the state of Ohio. Whatever you're looking for to uniquely scale your business, you can find it in Ohio. Go to JobsOhio.com to learn more.

Before the break, Snowflake CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy made the case that Snowflake is the most consequential company in AI and data in the world. Now he shares what he learned from last year's big data breach of Snowflake customers, his use of weekly war room meetings, and why AI hype is the biggest challenge facing today's business leaders. Plus, how he looks at the immigration debate in the U.S. as an immigrant himself. Let's jump back in.

I wanted to ask you about the data breach controversy that hit last year, soon after you came on as CEO. 165 companies who used Snowflake were impacted. The breach came via customers' accounts, not through your software vulnerability. But still, I'm sure the public fracas wasn't welcome. I'm curious how you faced that episode, whether it was an advantage or a disadvantage that you were early in your tenure.

And whether there were any lessons you take away from it. Security. We are very clear with our customers. It's a shared issue. Snowflake has offered multi-factor authentication for over a decade. We offered something called network policies where you can restrict who can connect to your Snowflake instance. Having said that, we are in it together with our customers.

Me going out and saying that so-and-so is at fault is simply not helpful. We were very clear after doing a lot of studies with external partners that there were no breaches or vulnerabilities in Snowflake systems.

We also started putting in place a series of schemes to make sure that we would act on our customers' behalf a lot more quickly. We now have systems that can detect access from surprising places and then warn our customers or turn off accounts. We now have dark web monitoring. So if there looks to be a credential that is compromised, then that credential is promptly turned off.

And, you know, we use this opportunity also to do other things like make sure that we had direct connections to the security folks and all our customers. So there was a lot of learnings in terms of how do we make sure that we are in true collaboration with our customers? How do we make sure they understand that this is a shared responsibility? And hopefully things like the incident that we experienced last year is a thing of the past. When the crisis first hit,

I think a lot of folks' impressions were, ooh, this is not going to be good for Snowflake. And yet in some ways, obviously you wouldn't want it to happen again, but in some ways it was good for your business. Like, look, many of our customers went through very unpleasant experiences as a result of this. This is not...

anything that I would wish on anybody. But having had it happen, you use it as an opportunity to both make yourself, the relationships, and the overall posture much, much better. You've attributed a lot of Snowflake's recent progress to weekly war room meetings. I'm curious what those meetings entail and whether we should all be doing war rooms?

Water rooms, as you know, they have particular connotations. And one of my Google colleagues famously, I think it was 10, 15 years ago, objected to water rooms. So I renamed one water room to be a basket weaving room. But, you know, the idea is how do you bring together people quickly in effective forums to help get power?

past a stumbling block that we have. Snowflake's War Room was in the context of the product engineering and marketing and the sales teams needing to work together, especially on new product offerings.

This is because Snowflake had come of age as a cloud data warehouse. We knew how to sell the cloud data warehouse. We didn't need to bring these different functions together in order to figure out how to sell these things. On the other hand, something like AI, we didn't know how to position it. We didn't know what our customers were exactly looking for. We didn't know the kind of problems that they were running into. This is where the close collaboration between the different teams that were responsible for taking new products forward were really helpful.

And the war rooms is much more in that context of how do you do something new that you know you're going to struggle and get that to a point of maturity. So it's for a very, very specific purpose.

Snowflake has invested in a lot of AI startups. You recently announced an expansion of your startup accelerator, $200 million in new commitments. You also announced plans to build a new big AI hub at your Menlo Park campus, a $20 million AI upskilling program. How does this fit together? What is this ladder up to? Let's start with the enablement investments.

Our aspiration is to train a million people on using AI and data products. And we are doing this in a number of different countries, including in places like India, where an increasing number of Snowflakes customers, often based in the US, are moving their technology operations too. On the startup side, we have a very healthy balance sheet. It's over $5 billion.

And there are lots of startups that want to build on top of Snowflake, use Snowflake as a data platform. So the $200 million fund is in combination with many venture partners to fund the next generation of companies.

The AI hub is more a physical space. We want to host a set of companies that want to experiment with AI. And it's a continuation of how we think about working with the technology ecosystem to help power the next generation of companies. And we're just happy to continue that because we see that as being mutually beneficial.

You mentioned the trend of businesses moving to India. You are an immigrant to the US from India. You came from India with just a few suitcases and a couple of hundred dollars, as I recall. There's so much angst in the US around immigration right now. How much do you think about it, given your personal experience?

Look, I'm very, I'm incredibly blessed. I came with a bachelor's degree. Yes, like I think it was $700. Neither of my parents went to college. I got a doctorate from Brown that Brown entirely paid for. I got a monthly stipend and a free PhD.

And I think I've contributed in meaningful ways to the country, helping create great, amazing businesses.

I think the larger issue is one that of our population feeling like there is enough prosperity to go around. People in our country need to feel like they have a prosperous future before they're willing to lean in and say, we want more immigrants to share in that prosperous future.

But I think those are the core issues that our government needs to address, where all of us feel like they have the opportunity, like I got the opportunity. My take is there's no generosity without prosperity.

And as a technologist engaged in the creation and the advance of technology, it sure sounds like or feels like it's enhancing opportunity and prosperity, but that's not translating to the broader public necessarily. It's more than perception.

I think the honest question that all of us need to ask ourselves, not just the immigrants, everybody, the government, the population, is, is the prosperity truly broad? Are there truly opportunities? Me arguing that, you know, people like me are going to create more companies and more jobs, if does not translate, you know, call it prosperity in the Midwest, is just not going to resonate.

You've said this, you know, that you can only unlock opportunity by embracing change. And for you as a business leader trying to embrace change, you know, there's also risk in moving too early when things are changing so much. How do you know what change is sticky, especially when, you know, headlines seem to blare about new convulsions every day? Build on strength. There are many things that are very real about Snowflake. There is nothing unreal about

about the $3.5 billion that we made as revenue, about the 10,000 plus customers that we have, about the mission critical role that we play. So with AI, for example, we didn't chase the hype. We didn't say, oh, we'll fine tune and host models for you. Here is a brand new way of making money that has nothing to do with what Snowflake used to do before. We said, let's offer AI as a natural companion, as a natural enhancer of what you're already doing with it.

And so you need to be very deliberate and thoughtful about how you create value, what your place in the world is,

And finally, you also have to be a little bit of a portfolio manager. There are five or six things that we are going to try. Some of them are not going to work out. And you have to have unpleasant conversations, hard conversations internally about what you need to stop. We used to do all of foundation models, but we backed away from it because we just said we just cannot afford to spend the amount of money that

and talent that is required to train foundation models. Was it an easy conversation? Absolutely not. But I think those are also important conversations where you accept that you're not going to know everything. And when the outside world speaks, you actually listen and adjust and move along. What do people and business leaders most misunderstand about the state of technology right now?

I think they are feeling both pressure about things like AI, but are also flooded with options for what to do. I think there's just so much just noise coming in terms of partnerships between X and Y or this new agent take this or the other.

I think that is just separating out what is real from what is hype, I think is very hard. I would say this is less a misunderstanding than an amount of confusion. And I don't think the AI industry helps itself

with things like not talking about hallucination rates or not talking about what does it take for something to truly be enterprise grade. There's a little bit of a, look Ma, it's so cool kind of attitude to some of the things that happen in AI. I think there is a maturity process that is going to happen. But I think figuring out what is real from what is hype is the biggest challenge that business leaders, enterprise leaders face today.

Well, Shudhar, this was great. Thanks so much for doing it. Thank you, Bob. Really appreciate chatting.

Sridhar may be soft-spoken, but he doesn't mince his words, especially when it comes to AI. I agree that separating what's real from the AI hype is critical for today's business leaders. And if you're a non-technical business leader, that challenge is even harder. As for Sridhar's own hype, is Snowflake actually the world's most consequential company in AI? Might it become that one day? I don't know.

Still, I feel smarter after listening to him. There's a thread that runs through Sridhar's comments that resonates for me beyond AI about confusion in the face of a lot of noise. Whether we're talking technology, tariffs, immigration, or whatever else, we strive to anchor on what's solid. Some of our confusion is because we want clear answers when there just aren't any. And even the most advanced AI won't solve that problem.

That's just something we have to learn to live with. I'm Bob Safian. Thanks for listening. The Lobatical is for any employees who have been with us for five years to take a vacation. They get a week of extra PTO. They get to pick anywhere in the world that they want to travel, and we allow that to happen for them.

That's Brooke Wright, Capital One business customer and chief people officer at Local, a change marketing company that works with huge corporations in order to facilitate meaningful communication between C-suites and their frontline. We wanted to celebrate them for the time they had invested with us. We liked the idea of a sabbatical, and so we made it us. It's the Lobatical. Local practices what they preach, caring for their employees with the same rigor they instruct their clients to enact.

My day-to-day is focused on making sure that we're living out the same principles that we're guiding our clients on inside of their large corporations. How you take care of your employees is a direct correlation to your customers' experience with your brand or product. The Lobatical is just one of the ways that local ensures their employees feel appreciated and cared for. And feeling appreciated is a principle that is shared by their partnership with Capital One Business.

We love our 2% cashback card. We can use the rewards to care for our employees. My favorite thing about Capital One, whenever I need to call, there's always a caring, helpful voice on the other end. You can't manufacture care, especially in a big company. And Capital One cares. To learn more, go to CapitalOne.com slash business cards.

Rapid Response is a Wait What original. I'm Bob Safian. Our executive producer is Eve Tro. Our producer is Alex Morris. Associate producer is Mashumaku Tonina. Mixing and mastering by Aaron Bastinelli. Our theme music is by Ryan Holiday. Our head of podcasts is Lital Malad. For more, visit rapidresponseshow.com.