We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode No Need for AI Unicorns: PepsiCo's Colin Lenaghan

No Need for AI Unicorns: PepsiCo's Colin Lenaghan

2021/6/8
logo of podcast Me, Myself, and AI

Me, Myself, and AI

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
C
Colin Lenaghan
S
Shervin Khodabandeh
Topics
Colin Lenaghan: 在百事公司,我的角色主要围绕着构建能力,帮助业务部门在未来取得成功,这包括巩固基础(确保拥有合适的人才)、建设未来增长(利用品牌潜力)和进行数字化转型(包括AI项目)三个方面。我们利用AI改进定价策略,将定价洞察的粒度从60个弹性系数提高到40000个,从而更精准地制定价格。此外,我们还利用AI进行促销优化,预测促销日历,以实现零售商和百事公司共同的目标。在人才方面,我们更倾向于组建一个团队,团队成员分别拥有技术、组织和商业方面的专长,而不是寻找全能型人才。我们通过从小规模项目开始,逐步证明AI的有效性,从而建立信任,推动文化变革。我们专注于利用AI解决战略性问题,例如提高销售额和改善增长质量,避免陷入战术性细节。我们相信AI是一种长期战略能力,它将帮助我们解决战略问题,并随着时间的推移不断改进和增强。 Sam Ransbotham: 与其他公司相比,百事公司的AI应用模式更注重内部人才培养和文化变革,这与Colin在百事公司的长期经验和对公司文化的深刻理解密切相关。 Shervin Khodabandeh: Colin关于“适合的马匹适合合适的赛道”(horses for courses)的评论很有趣,这反映了企业在AI应用中采用更灵活、更动态的策略。与其寻找全能的AI人才(AI独角兽),不如组建一个拥有不同技能的团队。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Introduction to the concept of AI unicorns and the episode's focus on Colin Lenaghan's work at PepsiCo.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Today, we're airing an episode produced by our friends at the Modern CTO Podcast, who were kind enough to have me on recently as a guest. We talked about the rise of generative AI, what it means to be successful with technology, and some considerations for leaders to think about as they shepherd technology implementation efforts. Find the Modern CTO Podcast on Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast.

Is there really such a thing as an AI unicorn? There might not be, but for sure there are horses for courses. Find out more when we talk with Colin Linehan, Global Senior Vice President of Net Revenue Management at PepsiCo. Welcome to Me, Myself, and AI, a podcast on artificial intelligence in business. Each episode, we introduce you to someone innovating with AI. I'm Sam Ransbotham, Professor of Information Systems at Boston College.

I'm also the guest editor for the AI and Business Strategy Big Idea program at MIT Sloan Management Review. And I'm Shervin Khodabande, senior partner with BCG, and I co-lead BCG's AI practice in North America.

And together, MIT, SMR, and BCG have been researching AI for five years, interviewing hundreds of practitioners and surveying thousands of companies on what it takes to build and to deploy and scale AI capabilities across the organization and really transform the way organizations operate. Today, we're talking with Colin Linehan. Colin is the Global Senior Vice President, Net Revenue Management at PepsiCo.

Colin, thanks for dialing in today from the UK. Welcome. It's my pleasure, Sam. It's an honor to be with you guys today. I'm excited to be in such esteemed company. Really looking forward to this session. Yeah, we'll definitely keep the esteemed comment in there for sure. Colin, can you tell us a little bit about your current role at PepsiCo?

My role globally very much is around building capabilities that help our business units win in the future. There's three major legs that I try to push or that I am pushing, right? One is, you know, solidifying our foundation. That's like, have we got the right talent in the right roles at the right time?

seniority to integrate all the different elements that have to come together for revenue management. The other leg then is, are we building for future growth? So if you take the potential of our brands and how we can position them with the consumer as relates to pricing and promotion, et cetera, that's a huge unlock for PepsiCo. And then this whole third leg is this digital transformation that we're calling it. And that goes from

everything from standardizing the analytics that we want all our businesses to be looking at across the world to speed up diagnostic, to speed up decision making and solutioning right through to this more advanced AI agenda. And we call that our AI program, right? So, you know, so it's those major three areas. And clearly we sort of orientate with what the business need is across the world and

And what are the capabilities that we need to help and support to deploy and clearly work to implement those and hopefully extract the value out of them? What is the scope of this that you're working on? The scope is right across the full spectrum of the PepsiCo portfolio. Everything from beverages to snacks, of course, dairy. This is a classic capability that can help to

solve some of the problems that we're facing. So I think the categories, we're almost agnostic on the category. If there's a really clear use case of where this capability can help us address a business problem, it really then can go across wherever we want. And I would see this applying as much to Quaker in the US as our Quaker business in China or our beverage business in Latin America to the UK. It's everywhere.

I think you've been at PepsiCo for 23 years, if I remember right. I'm 23-odd years at PepsiCo. And I actually started what you might call a net revenue management transformation in the UK eons ago, it seems like now. And at that time, we were building capabilities on systems,

but very much analog, very much linear. You know, I would say literally in the last 18 months, what we've had to adapt to has been very rapid indeed. PepsiCo clearly sees, you know, advanced analytics, AI as a core to how we're going to have to operate in the future. So, Con, if you can, give us one specific example of a place you've used artificial intelligence. What's one project you're excited about?

I think the example is very much related to pricing, right? Around, you know, how do we take very high level, very average pricing insights and transform that from, you know, if I could give the example, operating with 60 elasticities that help you understand where your pricing opportunity is to 40,000, right? I mean, that's the sort of scale.

that you're getting to. And then the decomposition of that elasticity around what it drags and draws from across your portfolio, across the portfolio in one retailer versus another retailer really is sort of mind blowing around what that can do. And that's a real live example of a product that we're scaling up as we speak. Capabilities like that give us insight.

around what the right bets to make are and how we can journey towards an end state around what that portfolio price architecture could look like. I think if we didn't have this type of capability, you would be flying quite blind. I think you'd be spending a lot of time with consumers trying to get answers out of them that they're maybe not equipped to give.

And, you know, I think you'd be taking bets and you'd be taking some risk because, you know, as we know, pricing is the most powerful lever in a P&L, without doubt, stronger than volume, stronger than cogs, whatever. You get it right, it's amazing. If you get it wrong, it's devastating. So across all the things we're trying to do, this capability on pricing for me is by far the most exciting. If we can get that deployed, let's say to 15 markets,

in a short period of time, I think that becomes really powerful in our ability to understand the marketplace and to candidly make sure we're giving the consumers what they want. Yeah, it makes sense. But going from something like 60 to 40,000, that seems daunting. There must be a pretty big carrot out there for you to want to do that.

I think once you begin to see, and of course, the 40,000 means you take a certain pack to a certain customer to a certain geography, right? It's just a full de-averaging almost of your pricing. So that's how you get that level of granularity.

My mind has now moved on to this is now what is just going to happen everywhere because why wouldn't we have this if my partners in the data and analytics team can tell me, look, we are industrializing this as we speak. You're going to be able to spin this off and build it in weeks versus months. It becomes a bit of a no-brainer as to why we shouldn't be considering that. I wanted to ask Colin, what's the best part of your job?

The best part of my job, it's almost a little bit why we're doing this podcast. I honestly learn every day. That's not a cliche or thing that I'm just saying. I mean, it keeps saying to people, I still get the butterflies every Monday morning where I think, crikey, what's going to happen this week? And what am I going to have to learn? And also, candidly, we're building a capability with PepsiCo that's relatively young. And I take...

great hope that there's a legacy there that I can be proud of. And then I've made a small contribution to helping the business. You know, that's, that's what really excites me about this role. And as ever with PepsiCo. I'm going to give you a chance to redirect though, from, from crikey, what do I have to learn to crikey? What do I get to learn? No, honestly, it's, it's absolutely true. It's absolutely true because these things are coming at me now, right? It's, it's, I have to, I have to embrace them. I have to learn. I have to be super uncomfortable. Yeah.

And honestly, I just go with it saying, look, this is making me uncomfortable. And that's probably a good sign rather than a bad sign. I am going through a personal journey with AI and it's real and it's eventful, shall we say. So how are you doing that learning? I mean, I'm sure you're a little further on the maturity curve than you're admitting here. I think you're being a bit modest with your background.

I think there's a couple of levels here. One, PepsiCo is very much an organization and a culture that learns by doing. So I think we're very targeted on key use cases where we see value for this type of capability. I think we're operating very collaboratively with agility across how we get those use cases developed, how we prove them out, and then how we begin to scale them.

But then broader, I would say PepsiCo is making quite an investment in just bringing literacy of advanced analytics up across the broader community, starting with the senior management. This is clearly something that has to be driven from the top. It needs cultural change.

And so we are starting to do a lot of work in elevating that literacy, really getting the understanding of what this is. You know, what do I need to know that is enough for me to embrace and leverage the capability versus be the expert? Right. I mean, obviously, we're hiring a lot of amazing people to help us do that and partnering with a lot of great parties outside of PepsiCo to help us do that.

I would say that's a big initiative right now as we start to build more and more use cases and start to build more products, as we call them. Then, you know, how we operate with that and candidly, how we learn to live with it is a big opportunity. And I would say we're all learning. I can speak for myself for sure. Actually, the problem with all learning is that everybody has to learn. I mean, so you mentioned the senior management. How do you get, for example, those people to learn something that they too didn't grow up knowing?

I think there's a lot of factors that come to that. One, being very overt about it and taking time to make it important. The tone from the top, I think, is very important in PepsiCo. We're all in on this one. I think this is one where it's kind of table stakes. There's no debate. You've got to be really leaning in heavily here if you're going to want to compete in the future CPG industry and broader.

So, you know, I think it's a combination of factors and I don't foresee it being an easy exercise or something that we're just going to, you know, walk up and do a course and, hey, we're all sort of literate. I feel this is going to be such a cultural process. You know, even how we're working and doing things is much more fluid, much more process oriented.

and an evolution, you know, you have to learn to really go in a very fluid way here. And there's a lot of zigzag left and right. There's a lot of two steps forward, one step back as you're experimenting and trying to get this capability to do what you want it to do. So I have to say, personally, I feel quite uncomfortable at times. I feel I'm not in control. But then, you know, I've just got to look at and sort of

engage with the team that we're working with and they kind of know what they're doing. So it's, you got to have a lot of trust in this thing around that. It's something that we're building for the long-term. And I think that, I think that long-term perspective is also very important. You know, I think another point related to how we're going to learn, I think seeing this not as a very short-term fix that it solves an immediate problem in 2021, but

This is going to just be capability that morphs into helping us solve lots of problems in the longer term. And so, you know, I think that's why we view it as a very strategic capability, helping us to solve strategic problems that, you know, hopefully over time we improve, we enrich, we get better and we strengthen the capability and hopefully the culture at the same time. Colin, I want to build on a point you made about the process not being effective.

set in stone and sort of the process itself is ever-changing and sort of a new way of working between all the parties that are involved. What do you think the role of yourself as a leader and other senior management is in giving comfort and stability in a situation, like as you said yourself, like you yourself aren't always sort of comfortable with it. How do you guys deal with that kind of a, I would say, a culture shift?

Like many large organizations, proving stuff out and very overtly socializing that clearly builds confidence, builds trust, and helps you to move from one step to the next. Another aspect of what we're trying to do with AI is the whole promotional optimization piece.

If you take results that we're starting to see from these capabilities, it immediately inspires trust and credibility. And therefore, that's a really important process for us because you're starting small, you're building confidence. And I think that's going to be important because if you really took on quite a large big bang approach with this thing, I just think it's overwhelming, right? Like I'm

acclimatized or acclimated as you guys in the USA. But I think we're very much into, you know, prove things out, you know, embrace, of course, and be very aggressive in what we're trying to do. But make sure we take the steps to take the organization with us to build trust and, you know, evolve the culture in that way. This sort of process that's not necessarily always set in stone.

you know, adaptability is part and parcel of getting these things to scale, right? For sure. This capability needs to trickle down into the hands and minds of people who do the day-to-day operations.

That's where the real hard work is. So as we put task forces together to get, for example, an MVP up and running, that's quite exciting, right? Because everyone's there, it's a project. But then you go, okay, so wow, that MVP worked really well, right? Now we're scaling this thing. We're taking it broad-based, maybe to a category within a market or a customer or whatever the case may be.

you very rapidly get from a very excited project team to saying, "Hey, I got to use this thing." And then I think you're into the classic potential areas where

You run the risk of it becoming tactical versus it being incredibly strategic. Do people really understand their role, how they're supposed to embrace it? Those, I think, for me and my sort of agenda that I have within PepsiCo, those are areas that are very top of my mind right now. But, OK, how are we really going to operationalize this day to day? Well, let's build on that.

You mentioned more of the strategic nature of this. Some of these things seem like small changes. How do you keep this collection of small changes from ending up in a place that isn't where your overall strategic focus should be? I guess, how do you balance that set of small changes and making incremental improvements with not just ending up in a place that's slightly better, but wanting to end up at a place that is strategically better?

Yeah, that's a great question because you can very much in the day-to-day of these projects and what you're trying to do get lost in that, right? I think the use cases, though, that we're trying to drive at and in PepsiCo, you know, in my space, those are very much around big levers for how we accelerate the top-line growth and improve the quality of our growth. So, you know, pricing is super strategic, right? That's not going to go tactical anytime soon.

promotional investment and using promotions to underpin category strategy and what we're trying to do with the joint value creation with our retailers. That is super strategic and that's not going to go away anytime soon. Ultimately, when you think about from the user,

is it always going to be efficient for these capabilities to be in verticals and in silos, or at some point, are they all going to come together? So the revenue manager in the field has all these integrated at his or her fingertips that allows them to plan strategically leveraging this capability. And that's a little bit of the vision of where we might want to be going in terms of these capabilities. So this is very long-term.

I think it's a little bit of the Irish saying that we have here around horses for courses. And I think we're quite pragmatic about that. But when you see the potential of it,

And what I'm fully expecting is that more and more parties begin to embrace this. It then becomes almost an expectation on both sides that we're going to have to operate with these types of capabilities. But if I take how we're trying to set these things up, what we want them to achieve, could there be some longer term vision of a more integrated solution underpinned with this connectivity and AI, which it can do? That keeps certainly what I'm trying to drive super strategic, I think.

As you think about talent, I'm assuming those are probably the three most important dimensions, technical, organizational, and commercial. You're finding that there is sort of unicorns out there that have enough of all three, or you're finding that it's required for everybody to have some of all three, but some with spikes in some or others, or could it work where...

where you've got sort of talent that's commercially and organizationally savvy on one side, and then talent that's technically savvy on the other. And combined, they sort of cover everything. I'm trying to get a sense of how much an individual contributor has to partake of all those three main components. It's a great question. And I think it also depends where you sit in the organization. So if you take globally, candidly, I need more

distinction in the capability set. So I need a classic strategy type individual to drive that sort of strategy agenda. I need a capability expert, and then I need a digital tech expert because we're building capabilities. The more you go down the organization, the more you see the need for the blend to come together in the operating markets. And you don't see too many unicorns. And I'm not sure you need to have the unicorn, right? Because

And ultimately, in the business, it's around how do you use this to commercialize and drive the business impact? That's good to hear because I think it's tough to find those people who can do everything. It sounds great on paper to find someone who does all those things, but the reality is we call them unicorns for a reason.

It seems like Colin's saying you could build a unicorn by having the parts. Yeah, you've got the parts. Assemble them internally together and sort of create the organizational unicorn rather than individual unicorn. That's right. Is there a specific example of an area where you guys put a solution in place and the organization went through that learning and that understanding that you can talk about?

Yeah, I mean, we're live in a particular market with one of those products that we have. And this capability is very much around how we predict a different shape of promotional calendar against the shared objectives between a retailer and ourselves. So it's very much a strategic capability. So for example, we might want to agree that

given the profile of the shoppers and the agenda of the retailer, they want to accelerate their top line growth. In another retailer, that could be they need to manage their margins a bit more.

And that's taking a full category view of how this capability can help them to do that. And it's not what you might refer to as common backward-looking tools. This is very much around forward-looking capability. Against this objective, we and the retailer have set, this is the shape of the calendar that needs to change for us to achieve that. I remember we went through a great process through the MVP of

We probably took a month in virtual rooms or whatever, bringing all sorts of other third-party data like panel data, like IRI data to validate this crazy hypothesis that this algorithm was suggesting. There's no way that will work on this particular part of the category.

And we managed to get sort of confidence that what the capability was suggesting for execution could work. And lo and behold, when we put it into the market, it was in the stores, hundreds and hundreds of stores. It worked. And this is a little bit about what we talked about before around proving that use case out, showing how it can predict different scenarios that maybe we would be comfortable with. And that then builds confidence for us to keep this and use this as a more strategic capability.

Well, Colin, many thanks for your time today. You've, I think, brought out a lot of things that many managers are going to feel like are urgent and are important for really for everyone, not just revenue management, not just snacks, not just sodas, but I think managers everywhere. Thanks for taking the time to talk with us today. Thank you very much. Shervin, Colin covered quite a few points. What struck you as particularly interesting?

I like this comment about Horses for Courses, talking about how the new reality that it creates in terms of how people will use it, how the big network of retailers and the whole ecosystem is adapting to this new ways of working and how even internally within PepsiCo, teams are doing things in different ways and more innovative ways.

Less static, more sort of dynamic and test and learn ways. I liked how he talked about this is going to be sort of our future. We all know that. And it's not going to be a one-time thing. It's horses for courses. And that's how the new course is going to be. Definitely. Horses for courses makes sense because there isn't just one horse that's excellent at every racetrack.

Similarly, I'm sure that companies would love to find an AI unicorn who is somehow magically good at everything AI related, but it just seems unlikely. You know, they're not going to find someone who are ML coding experts who can talk fluently with business managers and can communicate and present perfectly and still somehow willing to work at an entry level salary.

Instead, what Colin is talking about, and like others are saying, that success is a team composition where different people bring different skills. And, you know, even if some companies somehow could find a magical AI unicorn today, even that unicorn would have to learn as technologies change so quickly. Yeah, the other thing I really liked that he brought into the dialogue was

Well, first of all, the best part of my job is waking up every morning and saying, what am I going to learn today? And I'm looking forward to it, having been at PepsiCo for 24, 25 years. And I thought that's really, really encouraging and energizing coming from a leader. There's a bit of a contrast, too, in some of our other episodes, like with Walmart and Bacarma Hotra.

These people have gone through multiple jobs and relatively quickly moving from one technology space to another technology space, applying job learnings from different areas to their current role. Colin was a very different story. His own story about how he got to be in his role was quite different. He's learned while he's been there, not brought learning from other places.

Yep. And I think that's actually quite valuable in a place like PepsiCo. And it fits quite well to the point he made about what it takes to get these things to scale. It is about culture change, organizational change, and also commercial focus for value. And having been in an organization long enough to know what it takes to create that change, I think really works for him. I could have imagined if he came from outside with

series of very, very successful stints and highly digital companies, it might have been a very different trajectory for them. So the other part there too is that with that ecosystem, Colin mentioned the butterflies that he got every day, but there's a lot of butterflies and a lot of different people there. And in getting that trust so people are comfortable with those butterflies, hard job and not a technical job. No, it is a hard job.

Thanks for joining us. Next time in our last episode of season two, we'll talk with Elizabeth Raniere, founding director of the IBM Notre Dame Technology Ethics Lab. Please join us.

Thanks for listening to Me, Myself, and AI. If you're enjoying the show, take a minute to write us a review. If you send us a screenshot, we'll send you a collection of MIT SMR's best articles on artificial intelligence, free for a limited time. Send your review screenshot to smrfeedback at mit.edu.