We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Audio Edition: How Noether’s Theorem Revolutionized Physics

Audio Edition: How Noether’s Theorem Revolutionized Physics

2025/7/3
logo of podcast Quanta Science Podcast

Quanta Science Podcast

AI Deep Dive AI Chapters Transcript
People
S
Susan Vallich
Topics
Susan Vallich: 大家好,我将为大家介绍诺特定理如何通过揭示对称性与守恒定律之间的深刻联系,彻底改变了物理学。在1915年,爱因斯坦的广义相对论挑战了传统的能量守恒观念,引发了物理学界的震动。为了解决这个问题,数学家希尔伯特邀请了埃米·诺特加入研究。诺特通过深入研究,在1918年提出了诺特定理,指出每一个守恒定律背后都存在着一种对称性。例如,时间平移对称性对应于能量守恒,空间平移对称性对应于动量守恒。这意味着,守恒定律并非是宇宙的基本法则,而是源于更深层次的对称性。这一发现对20世纪的物理学产生了深远的影响,改变了我们对宇宙基本规律的理解。我们现在知道,宇宙的加速膨胀打破了时间平移对称性,导致能量不再守恒。诺特定理不仅影响了经典物理学,还在量子场论和粒子物理学的标准模型中发挥了关键作用,指导物理学家们通过寻找对称性来探索新的物理现象。直到今天,诺特的思想仍然深刻地影响着物理学家的研究方向。 Susan Vallich: 从我个人的角度来看,诺特定理最令人惊叹的地方在于它将看似无关的数学概念(对称性)与物理世界的根本规律(守恒定律)联系起来。在过去,我们认为能量守恒是一个独立的基本原则,但诺特向我们展示了它实际上是时间平移对称性的一个结果。这种统一性不仅简化了我们的物理理论,而且为我们提供了一个强大的工具来发现新的物理现象。例如,通过研究量子场的对称性,我们可以预测粒子的行为,并构建粒子物理学的标准模型。此外,诺特定理还启发我们去寻找那些可能被打破的对称性,因为这些对称性的破坏可能预示着新的物理规律的出现。总而言之,诺特定理不仅是一个数学上的成就,更是一个深刻的哲学洞见,它改变了我们对宇宙的理解方式。

Deep Dive

Chapters
Emmy Noether's theorems, published in 1918, provided a deeper understanding of conservation laws in physics. Her work connected conservation laws to underlying symmetries, revealing a fundamental relationship between symmetry and conservation.
  • Noether's theorems connected conservation laws to underlying symmetries.
  • One theorem explained conservation laws in small regions of space.
  • The other theorem (Noether's theorem) states that every conservation law is linked to a deeper symmetry.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

Did you know there's a paleoanthropologist who hunts fossils in conflict zones? That's just one of the amazing stories we're sharing on Going Wild, the award-winning podcast produced by Nature on PBS, hosted by me, wildlife ecologist Dr. Rae Winn-Grant.

In the brand new season of Going Wild, we're highlighting some of the coolest champions of nature, like TikTok's black forager, Alexis Nicole Nelson, and Pulitzer Prize-winning science journalist, Ed Yong, to explore what led them to create change within themselves and the natural world. Get inspired. Follow Going Wild with Dr. Raewyn Grant on your favorite podcast app.

Welcome to the Quanta Audio Edition. In each of these bi-weekly episodes, we bring you a story direct from the Quanta Magazine website about developments in basic science and mathematics. I'm Susan Vallich. Emmy Noether showed that fundamental physical laws are just a consequence of simple symmetries. A century later, her insights continue to shape physics. That's next.

Check out this feed every Tuesday for the Quanta podcast. That's where Editor-in-Chief Sameer Patel talks to our writers and editors about more of Quanta's most popular, interesting, and thought-provoking stories. In the fall of 1915, the foundations of physics began to crack. Einstein's new theory of gravity seemed to imply that it should be possible to create and destroy energy.

That result threatened to upend two centuries of thinking in physics. Einstein's theory, called general relativity, radically transformed the meaning of space and time. Rather than being fixed backdrops to the events of the universe, space and time were now characters in their own right. They were able to curve, expand, and contract in the presence of matter and energy.

One problem with this shifting spacetime is that as it stretches and shrinks, the density of the energy inside it changes. As a consequence, the classical energy conservation law that previously described all of physics didn't fit this framework.

David Hilbert, one of the most prominent mathematicians at the time, quickly identified this issue and set out with his colleague Felix Klein to try to resolve this apparent failure of relativity. After they were stumped, Hilbert passed the problem on to his assistant, the 33-year-old Emmy Noether.

No, there was an assistant in name only. She was already a formidable mathematician when, in early 1915, Hilbert and Klein invited her to join them at the University of Göttingen.

But other faculty members objected to hiring a woman. They blocked Noether from joining the faculty. Regardless, she would spend the next three years prodding the fault line separating physics and mathematics, eventually setting off an earthquake that would shake the foundations of fundamental physics.

In 1918, Noether published the results of her investigations in two landmark theorems. One made sense of conservation laws in small regions of space. It's a mathematical feat that would later prove important for understanding the symmetries of quantum field theory. The other, now just known as Noether's theorem, says that behind every conservation law lies a deeper symmetry.

In mathematical terms, a symmetry is something you can do to a system that leaves it unchanged. Consider the act of rotation. If you start with an equilateral triangle, you'll find that you can rotate it by multiples of 120 degrees without changing how it looks. If you start with a circle, you can rotate it by any angle. These actions without consequences reveal the underlying symmetries of these shapes.

But symmetries go beyond shape. Imagine you do an experiment. Then you move 10 meters to the left and do it again. The results of the experiment don't change, because the laws of physics don't change from place to place. This is called translation symmetry.

Now, wait a few days and repeat your experiment again. The results don't change, because the laws of physics don't change as time passes. This is called time translation symmetry. Noether started with symmetries like these and explored their mathematical consequences. She worked with established physics using a common mathematical description of a physical system, called a Lagrangian.

This is where Noether's insight went beyond the symbols on the page. On paper, symmetries seem to have no impact on the physics of the system, since symmetries don't affect the Lagrangian. But Noether realized that symmetries must be mathematically important, since they constrain how a system can behave.

She worked through what this constraint should be, and out of the mathematics of the Lagrangian popped a quantity that can't change. That quantity corresponds to the physical property that's conserved. The impact of symmetry had been hiding beneath the equations all along, just out of view. In the case of translation symmetry, the system's total momentum should never change.

For time-translation symmetry, a system's total energy is conserved. No other discovered that conservation laws aren't fundamental axioms of the universe. Instead, they emerge from deeper symmetries. The conceptual consequences are hard to overstate. Physicists of the early 20th century were shocked to realize that a system that breaks time-translation symmetry can break energy conservation along with it.

We now know that our own universe does this. The cosmos is expanding at an accelerating rate, stretching out the leftover light from the early universe. The process reduces the light's energy as time passes. Back in 1983, physicist and mathematician Faisal Ghirzi wrote that before Noether's theorem, the principle of conservation of energy was shrouded in mystery.

Gersey and Noether's simple and profound mathematical formulation did much to demystify physics. Noether's theorem has shaped the quantum world, too. In the 1970s, it played a big role in the construction of the standard model of particle physics. The symmetries of quantum fields dictate laws that restrict how fundamental particles behave. For instance, a symmetry in the electromagnetic field forces particles to conserve their charge.

The power of Noether's theorem has inspired physicists to look towards symmetry to discover new physics. Over a century later, Noether's insights continue to influence the way physicists think. Michael Kenyon-Golo helped with this episode. I'm Susan Vallett. For more on this story, read Shalma Wegsman's full article, How Noether's Theorem Revolutionized Physics, on our website, quantummagazine.org.

I'm Steve Strogatz. And I'm Jana Levin. And this season on The Joy of Why from Quantum Magazine, we're sitting down together. We have our own research areas, but we don't always get the chance to speak deeply about science and math beyond our fields. We'll ask researchers about moments big and small that inspire them and lead to incredible discoveries.

Lots of science news outlets provide coverage on applied work like health and tech, but we cover big questions in the study of life, reality, numbers, and information. We hope these stories spark your curiosity too. Join us for the joy of why from Quantum Magazine. From PR.