The rise of the Internet and big tech has led to increased competition in weather forecasting, with companies like Microsoft and Google entering the market to produce more sophisticated and precise forecasts.
The National Weather Service, part of NOAA, collects data and makes forecasts to protect life and property, providing weather data universally as a public service.
Private companies take data from NOAA and the National Weather Service, apply proprietary computer models, and sell specialized data and hyper-local forecasts to customers dependent on weather, such as utility companies or airlines.
Tensions arise from the National Weather Service's ethos of providing data for free, which competes with private companies selling specialized forecasts, and the flow of weather data, as private companies now launch satellites and sell data to NOAA.
The government now acts as both a supplier and a customer of weather data, buying data from private companies, which complicates the traditional model of providing data for free.
The aviation industry serves as a model, with private and federal forecasters collaborating to advise airlines on flight cancellations and delays during weather events.
A public good is something that can be used by multiple people without diminishing and is available to everyone. Accurate weather forecasts, such as hurricane predictions, meet this criteria as they benefit society collectively.
Improved hurricane forecasts have led to $7 billion in avoided damages and costs since 2009, as they enable timely evacuations and protective measures.
This message comes from Soladyne. Yesterday's approach to storage can't meet the demands of today's AI ambitions. Bigger, faster, and more energy efficient, Soladyne solid-state storage solutions are optimized for AI. Learn more at storageforai.com.
This message comes from St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, leading the way the world understands, treats, and defeats childhood cancer and other life-threatening diseases. And families never receive a bill from St. Jude for treatment, travel, housing, or food, so they can focus on helping their child live. One day of ICU treatment can cost up to $4,000. A grant from your donor-advised fund can help cover the cost of that treatment. Your help gives St. Jude families hope.
Learn more at stjude.org slash dafgift. You're listening to Shortwave from NPR. Hey, Shortwavers. Regina Barber here with an extra bonus episode for you this weekend. We wanted to give you a chance to hear something from our friends over at The Indicator, which is NPR's daily economics podcast. And this particular episode is about something science-y we think you'd be into. So thanks for checking it out. And here are your Indicator hosts, Weilin Wong and Adrienne Ma.
Adrian Ma, what is an app on your phone that you use every single day? Like besides the text messaging app? Yeah, or like Candy Crush or whatever. I would have to say the weather app. It's like the first thing that I open in the morning.
Me too. Now, here's another question. Do you ever think about where the weather forecast on your phone comes from? You know, until very, very recently, I had not thought about this at all. I just assumed like somebody...
was beaming it to me from a satellite somewhere. Yeah, I never really thought about this either until I started using a specific weather app on my phone. The app lets me toggle between almost a dozen forecasting sources. And confession, sometimes if I'm hoping for a particular forecast, I'll just shop around in the app until I get the forecast that I want. You're like, oh, it's going to rain today. Or is it? Or is it? Yeah.
I guess this just goes to show how much access we have to weather information these days.
Weather forecasting has gotten a lot more accurate in the last few decades. It's a multibillion-dollar industry. Companies from tech startups to huge corporations are competing to produce more sophisticated and precise forecasts. This kind of scientific arms race is bringing to the fore long-simmering tensions in the meteorology community. The tension is over how weather data should flow between the government and private companies and at what price.
This is The Indicator from Planet Money. I'm Waylon Wong. And I'm Adrian Ma. Today on the show, how much is an accurate weather forecast worth? Who should pay for it and who should benefit?
This message comes from Capital One. Say hello to stress-free subscription management. Easily track, block, or cancel recurring charges right from the Capital One mobile app. Simple as that. Learn more at CapitalOne.com slash subscriptions. Terms and conditions apply.
This message comes from Charles Schwab. When it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices, like full-service wealth management and advice when you need it. You can also invest on your own and trade on Thinkorswim. Visit Schwab.com to learn more.
Support for NPR and the following message come from Edward Jones. What does it mean to be rich? Maybe it's less about reaching a magic number and more about discovering the magic in life. Edward Jones Financial Advisors are people you can count on for financial strategies that help support a life you love. Because the key to being rich is knowing what counts. Learn
Learn about this comprehensive approach to planning at edwardjones.com slash findyourrich. Edward Jones, member SIPC. The federal government has officially been in the weather business since 1870. That's when Congress created a National Weather Bureau to collect data and make forecasts.
Today, that office is known as the National Weather Service. It's part of an agency called the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Commonly referred to as NOAA. And the National Weather Service is the main source of weather data, forecasts, and warnings in the U.S.,
Its job is to protect life and property. And that means making weather data universally available to everyone as a public service. So like when you see the local weather forecast on the news, for example, there's a good chance that the underlying data comes from the government. And then there are lots of businesses that are taking that data, slicing and dicing it and selling it onward.
Keith Sider is a professor of climate science at the College of the Holy Cross, and he's also a senior policy advisor at the American Meteorological Society. Twenty years ago, there were the few government agencies that worked in weather, and there were a fairly well-known list of private sector companies. Any of us could sit down with a piece of paper and write down the 20 main companies. And now that the private sector is vast, and it goes everything from very, very tiny one- or two-person companies to
up to companies like Microsoft and Google. Private companies like these take data from NOAA and the National Weather Service. They put their own spin on it, say, by applying proprietary computer models. They can then sell specialized data and hyper-local forecasts to customers that are highly dependent on the weather. Yeah, for example, think of a utility company that needs to monitor ice buildup on power lines during a winter storm. Or an airline that wants to reroute a flight to avoid turbulence.
or even a concert promoter that gets an alert to evacuate a stadium during a storm. Keith says there's been a couple of sources of friction between the government and these private weather companies in the last few decades. One source of friction has to do with the overall ethos of the National Weather Service. Keith says if the agency could provide better data to the public for free, it would do just that. Right now, on your phone, you can pull up and look at a radar image in real time.
In the 1980s or 1990s, we didn't have the cell phones to do that. But as, you know, websites became available, the National Weather Service said, well, you know, we can actually make this data available to everybody. But Keith says this stance didn't sit well with some private companies, you know, the ones making a living from selling specialized forecasts.
If customers could get sophisticated data from the government for free, maybe they wouldn't want to pay for that kind of information anymore. So that is one source of tension in the industry. Another one, Keith says, has to do with the flow of weather data.
Remember when we said the government is a foundational data source? That's because historically, NOAA and NASA paid for the big weather satellites that collect that information. Well, these days, Keith says private companies are launching their own satellites and selling the data. And NOAA and the National Weather Service have become customers.
In some cases, Keith says, the agencies are buying data from these private companies because it's cheaper than operating those satellites themselves. But then you've got a little bit of attention because the government typically provides all of the data it has for free.
And if they're buying data from a commercial satellite, they can't just turn around and give it all for free or else that commercial company only has one customer, which is NOAA. The government's new role as both a supplier and a customer of weather data has blurred the lines between public agencies and private sector businesses. But there are examples of the two sides working together.
Mary Glackin has been an official at NOAA and an executive in IBM's weather business. She says the aviation industry could be a model. If we know there's a weather event happening at an airport, what you'd really like to be doing is advising the airline what flights to cancel, which ones to delay. When I was at IBM, we would have forecasters say,
that would be on calls with federal forecasters a couple times a day before an official forecast came out. So that works well.
fairly well. Over the years, some policymakers have tried to limit the government's role in weather forecasting. This surfaced most recently in Project 2025, a policy blueprint from conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation. That document argues that some of NOAA's functions could be carried out commercially at lower cost and higher quality. But moving to a more privatized or market-based model for weather forecasts...
It raises questions about whether potentially life-saving information would only be available to people with resources. Yeah, like some municipalities supplement government forecasts with information from private companies that they pay for. But then it's like, what about towns that can't afford to do that? This is kind of a wild thing to think about when it comes to potentially life-saving information, right? Like one town...
has different information than another. Exactly. And in economics, we talk about this thing called a public good. A public good is something that can be used simultaneously by multiple people without diminishing. And it's something that's available to everyone. Renato Molina is a professor of environmental and resource economics at the University of Miami. He says an accurate weather forecast definitely meets the criteria for a public good.
Because, I mean, if we follow the definition, everyone benefits, right? You consuming a good forecast for a hurricane, for example, does not diminish your
You know, like my ability to consume the same good forecast and we all benefit. We're all better off. And this benefit isn't just abstract for Renato. He and a colleague crunched the numbers around this federal program that's aimed at improving hurricane forecasts. They estimate that it led to $7 billion in avoided damages and costs since 2009. That's because when weather forecasts are more accurate, local governments can request federal money for protective measures in advance of a hurricane.
They can also issue timely evacuation mandates. The hurricane forecast has generated immense value for society.
If you get an evacuation mandate, then you're going to take this seriously, meaning you're going to protect your house, right? You're going to pull down the shutters or, you know, like, board your house. If you might be exposed to some flooding, that might, you know, like, reduce the overall damages that you're exposed to if that happens. In the case of Hurricane Milton this year, accurate forecasts meant that many people in Florida had ample warning to prepare.
The alert enabled one of the largest evacuations in state history. And that might have prevented the devastation from being even worse. This episode was produced by Julia Ritchie with engineering by Kweisi Lee. It was fact-checked by Sarah Juarez and edited by Patty Hirsch. Kicking Cannon is our show's editor and The Indicator is a production of NPR.
This message comes from NPR sponsor Merrill. Whatever your financial goals are, you want a straightforward path there. But the real world doesn't usually work that way. Merrill understands that.
That's why, with a dedicated Merrill advisor, you get a personalized plan and a clear path forward. Go to ml.com slash bullish to learn more. Merrill, a Bank of America company. What would you like the power to do? Investing involves risk. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., registered broker-dealer, registered investment advisor, member SIPC.
This message is sponsored by Greenlight, the debit card and money app made for families, where kids learn how to save, invest, and spend wisely with parental controls built in. Sign up this holiday season at greenlight.com slash NPR.
Support for this podcast and the following message come from Autograph Collection Hotels, with over 300 independent hotels around the world, each exactly like nothing else. Autograph Collection is part of the Marriott Bonvoy portfolio of hotel brands. Find the unforgettable at AutographCollection.com.