We're sunsetting PodQuest on 2025-07-28. Thank you for your support!
Export Podcast Subscriptions
cover of episode Developers Are in Open Revolt Over Apple’s New App Store Rules

Developers Are in Open Revolt Over Apple’s New App Store Rules

2024/2/13
logo of podcast What's New

What's New

AI Deep Dive AI Insights AI Chapters Transcript
People
无特定发言人
Topics
Matthias Pfau:苹果公司的新规并未真正放松对开发者的控制,反而变本加厉地利用其在iOS平台的垄断地位向开发者施压,如同黑手党一般。他们控制着开发者对利润的获取,并通过拒绝更新、限制应用内支付等方式来限制开发者。即使欧盟数字市场法案(DMA)旨在规范苹果公司的行为,但新规依然未能改善现状,苹果公司依然滥用市场支配地位,如同独裁者一般。新规中关于警告信息的设置,会吓退用户使用非苹果管理的支付系统,从而损害开发者的利益。此外,对下载量超过百万次的应用收取技术费用,这将对Tuta等成长型公司造成经济压力。 Daniel Ek:苹果公司的新规对Spotify等大型应用来说,下载费用将急剧增加用户获取成本,可能增加十倍。因此,Spotify等应用只能继续遵守现有协议,这意味着他们仍然需要向苹果支付佣金,并且只能在其App Store上独家发布应用。这限制了他们业务创新,例如Spotify因苹果公司的佣金费用而无法在其iOS应用中销售有声读物。 Julian Trosdorff:苹果公司声称其对数字市场法案的修改符合法律规定,并能保护欧盟用户的设备安全。他们声称此举是为了保护欧盟用户免受恶意软件、病毒、诈骗和应用程序功能性问题的影响。 Sebastiano Toffoletti:欧盟委员会应该拒绝苹果公司的提案,如果没有进一步改进,甚至应该考虑处以罚款。 Andy Yen:苹果公司提出的商业条款是对欧盟的侮辱,这是对欧盟的侮辱,是对欧盟的侮辱。

Deep Dive

Key Insights

Why are European developers upset with Apple's new App Store rules?

Developers feel Apple's new terms entrench its power, restrict their options, and impose punitive fees, making it difficult to operate outside Apple's ecosystem.

How does Apple's new system affect developers' revenue?

Apple's new terms include a core technology fee for downloads and updates exceeding 1 million times in a year, which could significantly increase customer acquisition costs for companies like Spotify.

What is the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and how does it impact Apple?

The DMA is an EU regulation mandating changes to gatekeeper platforms like Apple's App Store, requiring them to allow alternative app stores and payment systems. Apple must comply by March 7 to avoid fines.

What are the 'scare screens' and how do they impact user behavior?

Scare screens are warnings issued by iPhones about security risks when using non-Apple payment systems, which developers estimate could deter 50% of users from proceeding with purchases.

What is Spotify's stance on Apple's new business terms?

Spotify believes the new terms are untenable, citing a potential tenfold increase in customer acquisition costs due to download fees. They prefer to stick with the current system to avoid Apple's commission.

How does Apple justify its new rules under the DMA?

Apple claims the changes are necessary to protect EU users from security risks introduced by the DMA, including malware, scams, and ensuring app functionality on its platforms.

What is the European Commission's role in this dispute?

The European Commission will assess Apple's compliance and the market's reaction after the March 7 deadline, potentially imposing fines if no improvements are made.

Chapters
Developers in Europe are outraged by Apple's new App Store rules, accusing the tech giant of behaving like a dictator and comparing its practices to the mafia.
  • Apple's new rules are seen as abusive and extortionate by developers.
  • Developers claim Apple treats iPhones as its territory, tightly controlling access and taking a chunk of profits.
  • The EU's Digital Markets Act was expected to loosen Apple's control, but developers feel the new terms are disappointing.

Shownotes Transcript

Translations:
中文

You're listening to What's New with Wired. It's Tuesday, February 13th. I'm Zeke Robison. Today, we're talking about a strong reaction from developers over Apple's new App Store rules. Make sure to listen to the end to find out what other Wired podcasts you can check out today. A battle for control is taking place inside iPhones across Europe.

While Apple introduced new rules that ostensibly loosen its control over the App Store, local developers are seething at the new system, which they say entrenches the power Apple already wields over their businesses. They're now breaking into a rare open revolt, mounting pressure on lawmakers to step in. So far, they have accused Apple's new business terms of being abusive, extortion, and ludicrously punitive.

Apple holds app providers ransom like the mafia, claims Matthias Pfau, CEO and co-founder of Tuta, an encrypted email provider. The tech giant treats iPhones as its territory, Pfau complains, tightly controlling developers' access before taking a chunk of their profits. Anyone wanting to provide an iOS app must pay a ransom to Apple. There's no way around it. For years, Apple has rejected Tuta app updates if they include links to the company's website, he says.

Like all iOS apps, Tusa has also been unable to take in-app payments directly from its customers. Apple acts as an intermediary and charges a fee.

Pfau was hoping the App Store reforms mandated by the EU's Digital Markets Act, or DMA, would make companies like his less tightly bound to Apple. Instead, he is left disappointed by the new terms on offer. What they came up with is the best proof that they are massively abusing their market dominance, he says. Apple is basically behaving like a dictator.

Apple was designated a gatekeeper under the DMA after the EU decided that the App Store acts as an important gateway between businesses and consumers. The company, along with other tech giants, has until March 7 to make a raft of changes. To avoid fines that can reach up to 20% of global revenue, the smartphone maker announced its new rules in late January.

The rules technically make it possible for users of its hardware to download apps from alternative app stores and also for developers to use their own payment systems bypassing Apple's commission. But in order to access these new features, developers have to sign up to new business terms. Those terms include restrictions that de-incentivize any developers moving away from the status quo, according to Pfau.

If his company Tuta were to take advantage of the new system, iPhones would issue warnings, known by critics as scare screens, informing users about security risks linked to using payment systems that are not managed by Apple. From Tuta's testing of how pop-ups affect in-app upgrades, he estimates these warnings would dissuade 50% of users from proceeding with their purchase.

Additionally, although the new terms allow Pfau to make Tuta available in an alternative app store, they would also expose the company to a core technology fee every time it was downloaded or updated more than 1 million times in a one-year period. Pfau accepts that Tuta, which he claims has over 100,000 paying subscribers, might not have to pay this fee in the first year, but we are growing, he insists. So we would definitely have to pay it within the next couple of years."

For Sweden's Spotify, the download fee is more of an immediate problem if the company were to accept Apple's new business terms. With our EU Apple install base in the 100 million range, this new tax on downloads and updates could skyrocket our customer acquisition costs, potentially increasing them tenfold, Spotify CEO Daniel Ek said on X soon after Apple released its proposal.

While Apple has behaved badly for years, what they did yesterday represents a new low, even for them. For that reason, Spotify, like other apps, believes it has no choice but to stick with its current agreement. Eck elaborated in a call with investors last week. That means still paying commission to Apple and listing their iOS app exclusively on Apple's App Store. No sane developer wants to pick any of the new terms, Eck said.

Sticking with the current system doesn't make the situation worse for companies like Spotify, he added, but it does mean that they are missing out on revenues from users buying products such as audiobooks, a new focus for the platform, through the company's app. Spotify does not sell audiobooks in their iOS app in order to avoid Apple's commission fee. So some of these more innovative things that we would like to do, we're currently restricted in doing on the iOS ecosystem.

Apple maintains its changes are compliant with the DMA, while also being necessary to protect its EU users' devices from the security risks that, it says, are introduced by the new law. Apple's approach to the Digital Markets Act was guided by two simple goals. Complying with the law and reducing the inevitable increased risks the DMA creates for our EU users, says Apple spokesperson Julian Trosdorff.

That meant creating safeguards to protect EU users to the greatest extent possible and to respond to new threats, including new vectors for malware and viruses, opportunities for scams and fraud, and challenges to ensuring apps are functional on Apple's platforms.

App developers don't have much power on their own to make Apple change course, but they hope their criticism will force the European Commission, a branch of the EU's government, to take action. After the March 7 deadline, officials are expected to assess both Apple's proposals and the market's reaction.

Now the European Commission must reject Apple's proposal and even consider imposing a fine if no further improvements are made, says Sebastiano Toffoletti, secretary general of the European Digital SME Alliance, an industry group. Andy Yen, CEO of Swiss email and cloud service Proton, is less diplomatic. If I was the European Commission, I would probably look at this as an insult, he says of Apple's proposed business terms. It's a slap in the face.

Make sure to check out our other Wired podcasts. Today in Wired Business, meet the pranksters behind Goody2, the world's most responsible AI chatbot. On Wired Science, find out if climate change helped a skier achieve the impossible. And on Wired Security, satellite images point to indiscriminate Israeli attacks on Gaza's healthcare facilities. Listen to these stories and more at wired.com slash podcasts.

Thanks for listening to Wired. Check back in tomorrow to hear more stories from Wired.com.